win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: How are the newer coverstocks holding up?  (Read 717 times)

BowlingJunkie6

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 15
How are the newer coverstocks holding up?
« on: March 02, 2004, 01:25:01 AM »
I haven't purchased many of the particle cover balls.  Only have 2.  How long have the coverstocks been lasting?  I know that some of the first Columbia line was dying out fairly quickly, (Rock Series).  Seems like they have been a little more durable than the opening series of balls.

I am looking to purchase some newer equipment to see the reaction of the newest balls, but I am always hesitant on spending a lot of money if a ball is only going to last 100 games or so.  I keep my equipment clean, and I haven't had any reaction problems from the reactive resin equipment.  I am not partial to any one company;  I think each company has their good and bad quality equipment.  I am looking at some of the Storm and Hammer equipment, and would be interested in comments to the durability factor of the newer coverstocks.

Any help is appreciated.

 

jensm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
Re: How are the newer coverstocks holding up?
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2004, 12:50:36 AM »
My experience is that particle coverstocks need regular maintenance to stay useful. A resurface every 100 games or so and light scuffs in between to keep the grab in the surface.

There are some good mid-price particles out there. Ebonite Predator Jungle Green is one of them. Good for medium to medium-heavy lane conditions.


--------------------
Regards,

jensm
Regards,

jensm