I've seen the product page, and I'll get it regardless, but does anyone know whether it has the exact same cover as the S&A.  I know it says pearl performance reactive, just like the S&A, but the listed name of the cover on the TS&A and TA was the same, yet there were tweeks.  Could the AF be a tweek of the cover used on the S&A, or could it be even more, perhaps using the Activator Advance as its base as opposed to the Activator +.
--------------------
four fried chickens and a coke[/size=4]

BUDDIESPROSHOP HAS SOME INFO
http://www.buddiesproshop.com/product.asp?id=3011
--------------------
Its just a game? Yeah Right! 2nd place is the 1st loser

I hope this might help you better.

For all intents and purposes, it is a Pearl Reactive Version of Seek & Destroy. It has the same Pearl Reactive Cover (Performance Pearl Reactive) that Shock & Awe had, along with the same shaped core design (Vanguard with upper flip block) that Seek & Destroy had, except that the densities have been altered in each piece (inner shell, body, and flip block) to create a later, stronger, and more angular move. This is mostly what I know as I will have mine shortly.
--------------------
FIRE ON THE LANES,ICE IN THE VEINS!!!!

Help a friend out:Sign the petition for caffeine free chocolate

http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?cfreecho

Viva La Metal Militia!!

This info is straight out of the horses mouth. 100% accurate.
--------------------
FIRE ON THE LANES,ICE IN THE VEINS!!!!

Help a friend out:Sign the petition for caffeine free chocolate

http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?cfreecho

Viva La Metal Militia!!

I spoke w/ King of the mill on this the other day, he had said that HE wasn't 100% sure because he hasn't spoke w/ Mo in a while....(he's in Japan).  But I asked the same thing Ballsdeep, I was wondering if it wasn't Activator Advanced like on the Smokin' ?
--------------------
JEFF
"...nowhere is the dreamer, or the misfit so alone...."

I spoke with Mo today.He told me that the cover on the AF is the same as the S&A.The core is a S&D that has been tweaked slightly.

Just one more thing, more of a statement than a question.  I was thinking the other day, and I personally wasn't real pumped for the AF.  It seems to me like it really isn't much different than the S&A with these #'s, but I then thought about the WMB and the S&D and how the S&D has a vastly different breakpoint and reaction than the WMB with a nearly identical cover, and just core modifications.  I know that many believe that the skid flip reaction of the S&A is enough, that one doesn't really need more flip(The particle cover on the WMB made the flippier reaction of the S&D look more necessary and revolutionary). One must figure that perhaps the AF will have the most angular backend of any ball ever made for medium/heavy oil.  However there are many possibilities for this ball.  The areas outside of 5 on many patterns, out of bounds, can be opened up, and heavy carrydown that makes most balls seem to back up and leave weak tens may be conquered.  I nearly found myself dismissing the ball, but the upper flip cap should make the ball quite different than the S&A, and more importantly the reaction should be something never seen before.
--------------------
four fried chickens and a coke[/size=4]