Post by: dizzyfugu on September 25, 2007, 11:36:39 PM
Does anyone know what the Labyrinth's mass bias strength or asym RG diff. is? Since it is a ball from 2000 or so and advertised as "highly enhanced mass bias", I guess that it will by today's standards have a mediocre strength (my guess: 0.012-15-ish?). Does anyone have this core info?
Another question would be how (relatively) strong the coverstock is, by today's standards? Again, we are several particle coverstock generations ahead, but if anyone can give me a good comparison with a current ball, what it handles or not, I'd be glad.
Background is that I have the hand on a single drill Lab', and the good reviews about this piece are tempting
Thanks a lot in advance!
--------------------
DizzyFugu (http://"http://www.putfile.com/dizzyfugu/") - Reporting from Germany
Confused by bowling?
Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
Post by: pgpelton on September 26, 2007, 08:52:27 AM
There is nothing in the Core Tech area as far as specs go for the Labyrinth.
Post by: BOWL119 on September 26, 2007, 09:37:54 AM
Email MoRich and ask them about the ball. They can answer all your questions. I have emailed them numerous times with questions and usually get an answer back within 24hours.
Good luck and post what they said so anyone can find the info if they need it.
--------------------
T.J.
BOWLING IS FUN NO MATTER WHAT YOU SCORE. BUT A 300 IS ALWAYS NICE.
Awesome Revs, Finish, Fury, Mammoth, Flip
GOOD LUCK AND GOOD BOWLING!!!
Support the Military they are the reason we have freedom...
Post by: charlest on September 26, 2007, 06:50:03 PM
As kotm has posted, it is general knowledge that the Labyrinth's Mass Bias is .008", that is the borderline, according to the gospel of Mo, as to whether or not the mass bias strength of ball has any TRUE, REAL influence. So, for all practical purposes, the Labyrinth is NOT a mass bias ball. Drill as a symmetric cored ball using the MB marking and the angle theory, instead of using the CG marker.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Worrying is like rocking in a rocking chair: it gives you something to do, but doesn't get you anywhere!"
Edited on 9/26/2007 6:50 PM
Post by: dizzyfugu on September 27, 2007, 07:55:28 AM
thank you all, also for the PMs. That's already a very big help for me. Nevertheless, I guess I will (additionally) contact MoRich's tech dept., too, just to cross check everything and for an "unofficial" feedback. I also contacted them before on technical matters, and they had been very responsive and helpful.
I'd love the ball to have a "weaker" MB, so I might succumb to the Labyrinth's call...
Best regards!
--------------------
DizzyFugu (http://"http://www.putfile.com/dizzyfugu/") - Reporting from Germany
Confused by bowling?
Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
Post by: charlest on September 27, 2007, 11:36:53 AM
It's still an excellent, excellent ball. Be sure to clean it regularly and thoroughly; it is a TEC coverstock.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Worrying is like rocking in a rocking chair: it gives you something to do, but doesn't get you anywhere!"
Post by: dizzyfugu on September 27, 2007, 03:08:55 PM
"Hi Thomas,
Thanks for taking the time to visit our web site and for the question!
The asymmetrical diff was never published for the Labyrinth, but measured right around .006
At the time it was considered a strong mass bias bowling ball, but by today's standards it is quite mild.
Best Regards,
Technical Services Department
MoRich Enterprises, Inc.
P: 1-877-530-0324
F: 1-804-550-3693"
Great customer service! And it confirms your idea, CharlesT, that the MB was/(is not that strong. I expected it to be stronger, but I am fine with this (in fact I like its lower power). Wow!
And thank you for the cleaning advice - is it a rather spongy coverstock? If I remember correctly, it is a Columbia-made ball, right?
--------------------
DizzyFugu (http://"http://www.putfile.com/dizzyfugu/") - Reporting from Germany
Confused by bowling?
Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
Post by: charlest on September 27, 2007, 05:57:36 PM
Its "lower" mass bias power really only means that once you drill it, it will respond better to hand and speed changes and you won't be locked into one type of breakpoint. To my mind, that is a good thing.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Worrying is like rocking in a rocking chair: it gives you something to do, but doesn't get you anywhere!"
Post by: J_Mac on September 27, 2007, 08:37:35 PM
--------------------
"A word to the wise ain't necessary -- it's the stupid ones that need the advice." Bill Cosby
"Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."