Could this be a Ravage with Activator coverstock.  My guess would be yes looks very pearly to me.  I do recall Brian Pinel however saying that they didn't like activator on some of their cores.  Does anyone know for sure? It is definitely a pearl.  Perhaps the same cover they used on the Punisher new N control Powerboost?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=36105&item=7116241803&rd=1
--------------------
I should just quit bowling, oh wait I already tried that.
Now that I am back and my Saws are sharp again, I am ready to cut some wood.

Edited on 11/23/2004 9:01 AM

The Story on the Ravage II is...

An overseas ball created to fit the taste of asain bowlers... they like skid flip in large amounts.  This ball has Activator+ on it, which is a less aggressive resin than the C4 Reactivated and R.A.V.; utilizing the high torque asymmetrical block from the Ravage but allowing for significantly more skid due to the less aggressive coverstock, resulting in a flippier reaction than the Original Ravage.
--------------------
http://mybowler.com/JW's+Junction/default.aspx

Check out the site!

Edited on 12/8/2004 0:12 AM

I spent the afternoon with Mo on Tuesday, and had all kinds of questions about his covers and such... and regarding the Ravage II he said it was Activator+ to accomodate the Asian market's seeming fascination with extreme skid-flip.  C4 was a bit too agressive for thier tastes as Activater isn't agressive enough for our stateside preference for smoother reactions and higher volumes of oil.
--------------------
http://mybowler.com/JW's+Junction/default.aspx

Check out the site!