Hey,
Doesn't Mo-Rich warranty their stuff against MANUFACTURER defects? Plain and simple, that is what this apears to be.
Regardless of who owns the ball, it appears to have had a flaw caused by the manufacturing process and thus should still be under warranty. I don't remember seeing anywhere that it is only warranteed to the ORIGINAL OWNER, just that it is warranteed for a specific time frame.
Not taking sides on this issue either way, but a warranty is a warranty, regardless of the ownership of the ball.
And really, how are you supposed to find a cracked/seperated core without pouring something into the holes? Who has time to X-ray a bowling ball prior to plugging it? And that still might not find the flaw.
If the guy is that knowledgable, he should know that the ball defect was found DURING the process of being plugged, and existed before the plug work was done.
Right or wrong, I think the ball should've and could've been warranted.
P.S. I had a brunswick ball (inferno) crack on me. I bought it used, but when I contacted brunswick, they told me they would warrant it, but it turned out that the ball was too old and OUT OF WARRANTY. I am sure that if they would have worked with Doug, even if the ball wasn't replaced, Doug would still have good feelings about things, much as I do about brunswick. They treated Doug like a simpleton, and I think that would have gotten to me, just as it did Doug.
--------------------
Brunswick will soon own the world.
You must face it.
There is no escape.