BallReviews

Equipment Boards => MoRich => Topic started by: adman on November 30, 2004, 12:00:55 PM

Title: Ravage VS Dirty Bomb
Post by: adman on November 30, 2004, 12:00:55 PM
Requesting your input on this comparison.

Between the Ravage and the Lane#1 Dirty Bomb, which coverstock or overall ball would be better for oiler conditions? Both with the coverstocks with the out of box surfaces.

Thank you
Title: Re: Ravage VS Dirty Bomb
Post by: JPRLane1 on November 30, 2004, 08:13:20 PM
Ravage = Solid coverstock, Dirty Bomb = Pearl.  Solid = more oil capabilitys.
--------------------
I should just quit bowling, oh wait I already tried that.
Now that I am back and my Saws are sharp again, I am ready to cut some wood.
Title: Re: Ravage VS Dirty Bomb
Post by: adman on December 01, 2004, 06:36:39 AM
Thanks for sharing the wisdom.
I already have the TA, Mayhem, WMB and the Uranium solid. I was just trying to settle a dispute between some friends. I also have a Ravage and Dirty Bomb and the Dirty Bomb seems to handle the oil (or carrydown) a little better than the Ravage. Not sure if its the cover or core that makes the difference. I have them both layed out the same.


Thanks again!
Title: Re: Ravage VS Dirty Bomb
Post by: JPRLane1 on December 01, 2004, 09:09:39 AM
The Ravage is most certainly not a pearl ball it is simply polished Solid PK18 it may look pearl because of the polish but thats it.
--------------------
I should just quit bowling, oh wait I already tried that.
Now that I am back and my Saws are sharp again, I am ready to cut some wood.
Title: Re: Ravage VS Dirty Bomb
Post by: agroves on December 01, 2004, 11:14:47 AM
quote:
The Ravage is most certainly not a pearl ball it is simply polished Solid PK18 it may look pearl because of the polish but thats it.
--------------------
I should just quit bowling, oh wait I already tried that.
Now that I am back and my Saws are sharp again, I am ready to cut some wood.


x2.
--------------------
FUFU