Gary--Being that we are both old VBP aficionado's. I think, I kinda have an idea what seems to match up with you. Unsure of what you are bowling on now lane condition wise though.
The GT would be a good choice though I prefer the Venom Shock as a benchmark ball for the majority of Motiv users. The Shock just matches up so well for the majority that it is almost a can't miss ball for so many. The weight block/cover match up is perfect IMO.
GT and Shock are both on the smooth rolling ball motion of Motiv's ball guide. They both are close to oil handling ability maybe GT a bit more but not enough to be a full step above. There is a reason that Motiv continues to keep the Shock in it's line-up after 3 years vs. already replacing the GT. I do have a Forza SS it's full step above the Shock and probably a 1/2 step above the GT. They....the Shock and GT plus SS are in the same place in smooth ball motion. The hybrid GT was better for most than the solid Forza depending on your stats. and amount of volume in the heads and over all. The SS for me is better than the original Forza. Probably because of the Sigma weight block in the SS.
I see you have your stats. in your profile which is good as not everyone is going to match up the same way as you do nor do they bowl on the lane condition you bowl on so it's all subjective. This is why I like the Shock it matches up for many more than any other Motiv ball.
Just my take.
Thanks, Scott.
I saw that the GT was on sale, so I was considering picking one up as I have not had a Motiv in a while and I always like benchmark type balls. Before I read your post, I had already placed the order for one based on a couple of the other replies.
My house went to a shorter pattern this year, 39 ft, and with my health issues, I am having problems with either too much hook or not enough. I don't think it is the pattern as much as it is with me, but in the past when I was bowling well, patterns in the 37-40 ft range always gave me problems.
I do have the Shock Venom in mind for a future purchase.