Ok, for all the people who is complaining about the online reviews, what do you suggest to make them better? What would you like to see?
(as I posted above) I'd like to see what I think is necessary:
"You need to use the ball with at least 2 different drillings and on at least 3 different oil patterns and you need to compare it to at least 2 other related balls with the same drillings and surfaces. "
so you have to be on staff. And the readers here do not trust their opinions. Interesting.
"so you have to be on staff. "
Why are you saying that and what is it in response to?
only staff members drill up 2 of EVERY release. I know I did. Now, it's financially impossible. The cost is too high with too little reward. So staff members have access to these releases at a much cheaper rate. But the readers here do not trust staff reviews. So who are they to trust?
Ok, I get it.
No, I wasn't implying that at all. AS I said in my original post (not just the few words I put in this reply to L3nnon), It is a lot of time and work to do a proper review. Not even the cheap prices of balls for staffers allows them to do what is needed for what I regard as a proper review. That why in my original post I added this:
"Not only does the actual testing take a lot of work, the writing and the analysis take even more time and work. This is why I stopped doing them – it’s a full time job and no one pays a red cent.
Show me 2 people who do that regularly and I'll tell you they work for BTM and BJI.
I did 2 of them about 10 years ago and and stopped. "
