Nick, prior to stating "fact", you need to have a study conducted of the ball and surfaces that is not done by you (meaning Brunswick). Would everyone trust a study that was conducted on a specific product when tested by the company producing the product? Although I would love to 100% believe everything, I also know that is not a true test and the test needs conducted independently. No, not the USBC either. Someone completely independent of the bowling industry that has no skin in the game and quite frankly, does not know anything about covers, etc.
You are also stating opinion when you state "historically regarded for their longevity". Maybe compared to Ebonite, Storm, or whoever, sure. But Motiv is new to the business and quite frankly the covers have held up better in the few years Motiv has been in the game. The numbers in the shop back this up. So this is not an "opinion" this is backed up by fact. When the shop is doing more resurfacings and oil extractions on a fewer number of sold Brunswick poured balls than Motiv, there is a longevity factor there.
I am sorry that you are on staff and will defend Brunswick to no end. You should, it is your job. As I stated previously, I have and love Big B stuff. I just know going in I will need to do more TLC on them. I am NOT on any staff and get to use whatever I want and push what the customer wants and not what a specific company wants.