I think there are several points that need to be addressed by the USBC and made public that might help folks deal with this situation.
First, how much notice was Motiv given before the USBC released their findings/determination publicly.
It makes a difference if you think about it. We are presuming that Motiv found out just like everyone else, when the USBC released their findings. If that is the case, I commend Motiv for doing the best they could in that case. They had to make some kind of a statement. Replacing the balls was a no brainier, but they may not have had time to formulate a plan to deal with the the drilling costs. Easier to say your not covering them, then changing to covering once you find a viable solution, than the reverse. Until they actually put their action plan into effect and it goes live, they have time to adjust as they need and see fit.
My son has a Jackal that will need to be replaced, would have taken it to tournaments he's bowling in this coming weekend. But he does have other balls to make do with.
I'm willing to hold judgement until their plan to deal with this goes live.
I would consider no notice a misstep for the USBC, they should have given Motiv a notice that it was coming. Notice was not going to change what they did, but give Motiv a chance to prepare a response.
If Motiv had several hours to coordinate a response, then it's on Motiv for what was released.
The other thing (that I would like to see) is them release the data that they've accrued on the balls in question. Initial testing results when certified and number of balls tested, as well as the current findings and number of balls tested.
Just to settle the lingering questions of this being a hit job. It does matter to some folks out there.