L3nn0n
Many have posted publicly and to me in a PM that they agree and have thanked me for fighting for the issue. So...if this upsets you so much, and I have no idea why because Motiv providing drilling has NOTHING to do with you....block me, don't read my posts, or whatever makes it so that your blood pressure stays under 200. I am entitled to my opinion, and my opinion is not going to change.
So to you, GET OVER IT yourself. I am allowed to state my opinion all day long. Don't like it? TOO BAD. Want everyone to agree with you? Go become the dictator of China or North Korea.
You are entitled to your opinion and you obviously do not agree with me. That's fine, that is what made the USA so great....when we had people willing to stand up on 2 sides of an issue and debate it out. I am not going to stop you from you stating your opinion with facts, not slams and for me to shut up or go away because you think whatever is the reason I am trying to get Motiv to pay a drill fee.
And by the way, as for the misfortune of others....the only misfortune here is Motiv sold a ball that was advertised as legal for any and all future USBC sanctioned competition. We know how that has turned out.
In a court of law, with civil lawsuits, isn't there a few parts to the puzzle? Can't you be provided relief in the form of actual losses AND losses for hardship/pain/suffering? Companies found guilty of negligence have traditionally had to pay more than just what someone has lost as a result of the company's negligence. The extra money is a way to tell the company, don't do it again.
Steven
In a court of law, Motiv might find out, after paying attorney fees, that they (Motiv) have to pay for new balls to be drilled for customers. If you were Motiv, would you want to risk paying attorney fees and then still find out the company is on the hook for paying for drilling? It is a risk reward type scenario.
The threat of lawsuits has been hung over Motiv. What exactly is anyone's guess...