I will pretty much agree with everyone in this thread. For 1, WRW IS a bit of an a-hole, VERY cocky, pretty rude, & all in all not a people person.
The problem with comparing WRW to Earl is like comparing Jordan to Chamberlain. Its 2 totally different eras of the game. While Earl IS the winningest bowler in history, & will probably remain that way, he didnt exactly have the type of competition we have these days. Then again, he also didnt have the same advantages in equipment, so its possible that it evens the playing feild, but we will never know that.
All in all, can we just say that WRW is amazing, & so is/was earl?
Shawn