win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: A possible solution for the PBA  (Read 7975 times)

Rantings

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 359
A possible solution for the PBA
« on: November 24, 2010, 04:00:28 AM »
Just an idea. I'm not sure this is original even.

 Would the PBA benefit joining with the USBC membership on a Tour that would include both a male version and a female version? Say have a $5.00 fee added to the dues and give the bowling public ownership under USBC guidance? Having the money go toward prize funds. This might be simplistic but it would generate money needed for the PBA to grow? You could have both the tours in the same city at the same time on certain dates and have the winner of their respective events bowl against each other. Many possiblities.
--------------------
Bowling is for sissies..ask Bones...

 

ToiletLogCore

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 161
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #46 on: December 10, 2010, 03:39:36 PM »
quote:
Your asking 2 million+ people to pay for an event that they are not attending???

 If they need money that bad beg for it on TV. Don't ask another business(USBC) to have its members give money.

Do the Lakers charge an extra $1 to give to the LA Galaxy?

That is how stupid your suggestion is. It isn't even close to the same.

Why not ask the AARP to charge its members an extra $1 to go in as well.
--------------------
Be good, or be good at it.


Wow you really are a moron.  Lakers giving to Galaxy, that's not even close to the same thing.  
How about the USGA giving to the PGA.  Guess what PGA and PBA had exactly the same prize funds in the 70s and early 80s, which one is doing better now?  

Better sponsorship is needed.  But what morons like you don't realize is that the sponsors won't give money to things that their own people won't support.  So when it all comes down to it, it's morons like you that b!tch about how the PBA is dying yet won't do anything to support it.  CHEAP FUCKS
--------------------
You've just been handed a little TLC

rcorbitt

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #47 on: December 10, 2010, 04:23:35 PM »
I think we're forgetting about two USBC tournaments the Masters and the US Open. Both of these are "sponsored" by the USBC. How many times in recent years have non-PBA members won either tournament?

If the PBA didn't exist, and the USBC ran "tour-like" tournaments, I doubt anyone would mind USBC dues supporting those events.

I've said before, the PBA should be left to stand or fail without USBC interference or support. I think in my lifetime, we'll see both organizations dissolve.

River700

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 864
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #48 on: December 10, 2010, 04:32:03 PM »
The Grudge has provided some very valid points!

Because of what the government is doing, causing a lot of the smaller businesses to collapse, do you think that the pba is in with the government in making the "pba" go under? It's just an idea though. I mean those people in the pba who govern everything don't care about anything or anybody else but they sure are trying to save their FAT pay checks from disappearing though.

Someone said something about the pba buying certain centers to host pba events in is a good idea, but will they do it? Will they even let the vote go any where? If they actually cared, there wouldn't be the problems that are currently happening.

It comes down to "two" things here with the pba, if they care they will take the best ideas and implement them, if they don't then they won't even look at the good ideas that will improve the infrastructure of the pba and let it die out. The question is, if it dies out, then where will they get their fat pay checks from?
--------------------
Bowling is fun, enjoy it, don't hate it

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #49 on: December 10, 2010, 08:39:49 PM »
It could be $.50 for all I care. They don''t deserve it. Whose to say the PBA doesn''t have money and is just mismanaging it? They will do the same thing even with more money. So feel free to send in all of the money you want, but forcing others to do so is a horrible idea.

Maybe the PBA could charge more to players and people attending the events like real sports do? I don''t care if the PBA falls off the face of the earth. I''m not asking anyone to save it. They have made it unwatchable on TV, and they are in the position they are for good reason. Not USBC fault or place to bail them out.

Start a yearly PBA/PBS marathon and see how that works out. The PBA is a business owned by business men from different successful companies and you morons want to bail them out. That is priceless

--------------------
Be good, or be good at it.

Edited on 12/10/2010 9:43 PM
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

KCBowling

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 6
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #50 on: December 10, 2010, 10:01:19 PM »
lotsofstrikes,

My son who is 14 told me the other day that he wants to quit bowling and start concentrating on playing Golf. I actually was a little relieved but I ask why. He laughed and said, really dad, everyone knows that there is no money in bowling. When our kids are getting it, there's a problem.. I think an extra Washington every year would be a great idea.

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #51 on: December 10, 2010, 10:30:54 PM »
I don't hate the PBA. I think if you have watched it the past few years and seen the desperate attempts at making it popular by changing you would better understand why it is in the condition it is in.


Lets add gold pins and cheer while they throw the ball again. It would go great with the huge scoreboard backdrop that makes every event look like it is held at the same place.

The reason golf has come so far is because of Tiger woods and youth. Nike and other sponsors were soon to follow and the sport grew. They didn't come up with new gimmicks weekly. The got younger and everyone benefited.

The PBA hasn't asked for help, so why are you all so eager to give them millions of dollars? It really makes no sense. If a Microsoft CEO and others own the PBA they are more then capable of finding money. They charge companies like Ebo, Brunswick and everyone else nearly $170,000 a year per brand to be sponsored on the tour. That is about $1,200,000 for Ebonite alone. Now what they do with the money is another story.
--------------------
Be good, or be good at it.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

Whos Left

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #52 on: December 11, 2010, 02:12:24 AM »
Kid--It isn''t that difficult to figure out.  If someone owns something (PBA),
noone else has any right to make business decisions.  I am not a PBA member
so I don''t have to stand up and fight anyone.  The PBA has, for many years,
despite whoever owns it, has lost money.  Before the Microsoft people bought
it, they were in desperate straits and deeply in debt.  Also, your assessment
of the golf scene and youth is not an accurate one.

Edited on 12/11/2010 3:16 AM

The Dreaded Durbin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #53 on: December 11, 2010, 02:29:45 AM »
Ebonite does not pay close to $1,200,000 to have their products registered.  Your numbers are a tad off base.  The numbers are a tad off, even if you figure out the math and over inflate it.  They pay a base fee for the Ebonite Brand, then fees for the other brands, but none for the bags and accessories as they are part of the brand.  


Its a couple hundred thousand, but its not close to 1 and a half million.

There is only 4 ball brands, and even at $170,000 a brand that is
$680,000. Now separate accessory brands do not pay the same amount as the ball registration.  





"The PBA hasnt asked for help, so why are you all so eager to give them millions of dollars? It really makes no sense. If a Microsoft CEO and others own the PBA they are more then capable of finding money. They charge companies like Ebo, Brunswick and everyone else nearly $170,000 a year per brand to be sponsored on the tour. That is about $1,200,000 for Ebonite alone. Now what they do with the money is another story."




Edited on 12/11/2010 3:35 AM

Edited on 12/11/2010 3:45 AM

Edited on 12/11/2010 3:47 AM

Edited on 12/11/2010 3:48 AM

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #54 on: December 11, 2010, 06:08:57 AM »
Really the youth of today haven't taken interest in golf? Thats a new one. I guess Tiger isn't the reason the PGA benefits from all the newer bigger sponsorships that have driven the money to all time highs in the sport.

The money is out there for a product that people want. You want to get more money in the sport then get more people to watch bowling. Instead people would rather give them money from a different company to support a failing company that did not ask.

Ebo may pay less but it isn't by much for all their brands used.

"Full registration runs in excess of $126K to the PBA. That's per brand, not manufacturer."


That is a lot of money when all companies are figured in for the PBA. not continue TV revenue and sponsorship.


--------------------
Be good, or be good at it.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

The Dreaded Durbin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 123
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #55 on: December 11, 2010, 06:23:54 AM »
The parent brand pays the most amount, than there is a price for each umbrella brand under the parent brand.  

I will see if I can contact somebody and get the total figure for sponsorship.

I would like to know how much ball sponsorship is being paid.  Maybe the organization itself would give out that info.  

Either way, there is not enough money to cover the expenses, prize funds and buying television air time.

TV time is NOT CHEAP, even at the rate they must pay ESPN.  I''''m going to guess at least $150,000 to $200,000 just for TV/Production Crew/Air Time a show in total expenses, when they are really touring different cities.



Edited on 12/11/2010 7:28 AM

Rantings

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 359
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #56 on: December 11, 2010, 10:01:11 AM »
Thinking out loud here. It seems that the awards would of had to get cut down since more and more honor scores are being shot and a shrinking membership. My original idea was that the PBA be "invested into" not subsidized. The bowler who pays membership would have ownership. The USBC would be responsible for the investment. This would give you the USBC member alot more courses in making sure your money is being invested properly. You could actually force the USBC to open its books on expenses incurred for this.
--------------------
Bowling is for sissies..ask Bones...

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #57 on: December 11, 2010, 04:38:05 PM »
No chance lotsofstrikes, send your check to the PBA I'm sure they will spend it wisely.

I've yet to complain about the sanction fees for USBC. I will suggest that the USBC is not doing a great job with bowling right now and making bad decisions.

They don't care what we think. So how will us giving them money to go towards the PBA work? They still won't listen, and don't what they choose with the PBA.
--------------------
Be good, or be good at it.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

Whos Left

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 105
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #58 on: December 11, 2010, 08:49:13 PM »
Kid-you read what you want into things.  Noone said that the youth of today
was not interested in golf.  However, the difference in prizes also is reflected in the cost of an average outing.  The number of golf rounds is down
substantially across the US in the near past.  People are much more careful
in how they spend their recreational dollar.  I am not going to waste any more
time on you.

kidlost2000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5789
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #59 on: December 12, 2010, 12:24:29 AM »
quote:
Kid-you read what you want into things.  Noone said that the youth of today
was not interested in golf.  However, the difference in prizes also is reflected in the cost of an average outing.  The number of golf rounds is down
substantially across the US in the near past.  People are much more careful
in how they spend their recreational dollar.  I am not going to waste any more
time on you.


So now it is because golf cost less? Sorry your time is so valued and your points are not.

Golf was mentioned compared to bowling in reference to prize funds from the 70s. Well Tiger brought more money to the game of golf then ever before. Tiger brought more youth to the game of golf. Watch anything on golf and you will learn that. Bowling in H.S. and college is on the rise. That still doesn't translate to the PBA. That also doesn't mean that the USBC should fund the PBA. Since the UBSC is trying to keep its self relevant and weather hard times, I doubt trying to carry the PBA is in the near future.

Once again, get the PBA more viewers and you will get the PBA more money. PBA VS NFL is not going to get the PBA more viewers.
--------------------
Be good, or be good at it.
…… you can't  add a physics term to a bowling term and expect it to mean something.

BBU

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1246
Re: A possible solution for the PBA
« Reply #60 on: December 12, 2010, 02:38:37 AM »
How about doing away with the EXEMPTION! Go back to the old days when you had a couple hundred show up to qualify. You had house bowlers, regional bowlers, and the tour bowlers all showing up to compete. With all of these stupid exemptions and restrictions, its hard for the average joe bowler to get out there and give it a shot. Ive bowled a few PBA events and almost made the top 64 once, but Id surely give it a better try if the crap rules were open up more to the USBC bowlers. It would even draw in a lo more money. JMO
--------------------
900 Global
http://www.900Global.com
Tony Hubert - Radical Bowling Technologies Regional Staff Member

www.radicalbowling.com

https://www.facebook.com/tonyhubert

Ball Motion Videos - http://www.youtube.com/user/ExtremeMediaGroup