BallReviews

General Category => PBA => Topic started by: tfav44 on May 10, 2009, 04:02:36 AM

Title: Big Nasty and Roto grip
Post by: tfav44 on May 10, 2009, 04:02:36 AM
Do you guys think the roto grip balls improved his game? was the track equipment inferior?
--------------------
tfav44
twisted fury
eraser boost
ebonite bash.
cell pearl
every frame is a opportunity to succeed!
www.virginiabeachtraveltips.com
www.bowlnortel.com
Title: Re: Big Nasty and Roto grip
Post by: Ebonite BowlToWin on May 10, 2009, 12:05:51 PM
wasnt he columbia before roto grip?
--------------------
"If you're bowling badly, don't sweat it, you probably bowl better than Obama" -R.N.

Stats and Arsenal In Profile
Title: Re: Big Nasty and Roto grip
Post by: tfav44 on May 10, 2009, 12:11:14 PM
I'm pretty sure he was with track.
--------------------
tfav44
twisted fury
eraser boost
ebonite bash.
cell pearl
every frame is a opportunity to succeed!
www.virginiabeachtraveltips.com
www.bowlnortel.com
Title: Re: Big Nasty and Roto grip
Post by: LEFTYBOY on May 10, 2009, 12:11:15 PM
He was Track first then Columbia the Roto Grip
Title: Re: Big Nasty and Roto grip
Post by: walterrayseggs on May 10, 2009, 12:20:49 PM
Maybe he just got better? He did pretty well with Columbia last year, had a few bad breaks that cost him titles. Same with Track. Remember all the fouling he did a while back? Chris Schlemer is maybe more in touch with his guys needs as well.
Title: Re: Big Nasty and Roto grip
Post by: tfav44 on May 10, 2009, 12:21:17 PM
My main question is do you think the equipment is the reason for his success. scroggy loved the cell line (even though he's throwin storm now.
--------------------
tfav44
twisted fury
eraser boost
ebonite bash.
cell pearl
every frame is a opportunity to succeed!
www.virginiabeachtraveltips.com
www.bowlnortel.com
Title: Re: Big Nasty and Roto grip
Post by: 3835 on May 10, 2009, 12:23:36 PM
Technically, he was Columbia (remember he was in the pic for the Big Bully), then Track for a year, in which he did very well, then Columbia again when Columbia was part of Ebonite, and now Roto.

3835
Title: Re: Big Nasty and Roto grip
Post by: abrown on May 10, 2009, 12:42:27 PM
i would say that the balls tend to fit his games a little bit more it seems there stuff is just very veritile for him and he can play all the patterns very well where as he had alot more options with columbia and track wasn't as versitile back then
Title: Re: Big Nasty and Roto grip
Post by: NJStroker on May 10, 2009, 01:10:24 PM
besides this season, track gave him his best season ever, that is now a close second compared to this one
--------------------
Im so glad people are brainwashed to think that TRACK sucks. And its even funnier when im carrying with my TRACK ball and they're going flat ten with their OTHER BRANDS ball.
Title: Re: Big Nasty and Roto grip
Post by: LuckyLefty on May 10, 2009, 01:32:04 PM
He....can bowl with anything!

REgards,

Luckylefty
--------------------
Open the door...see what's possible...and just walk right on through...that's how easy success feels..
Title: Re: Big Nasty and Roto grip
Post by: charlest on May 10, 2009, 04:32:09 PM
quote:
My main question is do you think the equipment is the reason for his success. Scroggy loved the Cell line, even though he's throwing Storm now.
--------------------
tfav44


No, Roto-Grip is NOT the reason for Wes's success.
Wes is the reason for his success.

--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."