I have no real problem with Stone (I forgive the fact that he knows little about the game because his energy and fresh terminology is entertaining), but on the other hand, is Dave Ryan really that bad? Seriously? Dave's understanding of the game is light years ahead of Stone's (point for Dave), Randy has pretty good chemistry with both of the guys (wash), and Stone's energy is light years ahead of Dave's (point for Stone). Seems pretty equal to me. And before you all go and criticize stuff like "60 feel to success," don't give Stone a free pass because all he does is make up corny catchphrases and explanations to hide the fact he has no idea what's going on from a technical standpoint.
Sometimes, I wonder why 90% of you people even bother to tune in on Sunday. Do you tune in to watch the bowling, or do you tune in to hear award-winning commentary? These guys are there to call the action, and for the most part, in their own unique ways, both guys pull it off without being awkward with their partner. For my money, that's good enough, as long as ESPN continues to include bowling in its broadcast lineup. Would you prefer they have no commentary? Get over it.
--------------------
"Nobody in the game of football should be called a genius. A genius is somebody like Norman Einstein."
-Broadcasting Extraordinaire and Mensa Member Joe Theismann