Mark Roth, Marshall Holman, Dick Weber, Johnny Petraglia, Nelson Burton Jr., Dave Davis, Dave Soutar, Mike Durbin, Wayne Zahn, Bill Allen, Dick Ritger, Don Johnson, Jim Stefanich, Carmen Salvino, Wayne Webb, and the list goes on--were these bowlers scrubs--I think not!!! To say that Earl had no competition and that today's bowlers are better, is hypocritical in my opinion.
This argument of who is better is an exercise in futility.
Both Earl Anthony and Walter Ray Williams should be celebrated for their individual accomplishments, and not dissected, analyzed and further ripped to shreds in order to diminish and devalue what they were uniquely able to do.
Earl was able to amount huge success in a short period of time and Walter has amassed his titles over a long period of time--this is the way it was meant for each individual, and each should be revered for their unique way of getting things done.
They are both great, but one is not better than the other!
Regards,
BowlingWolf