win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Bayer Classic Round of 64 - Block 1  (Read 1572 times)

Borincano

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1181
Bayer Classic Round of 64 - Block 1
« on: February 07, 2008, 05:39:14 AM »
Edited. Get Your winners or whinners.
Now this with 7 games.
Pos £  Name  Hometown   Games   Total
Pinfall  +/-
200  Average  
1  Sean Rash  Wichita, Kan   7   1701  +301  243.00  
2  D.J. Archer  Mineral Wells, Texas   7   1677  +277  239.57  
3  Chris Barnes  Double Oak, Texas   7   1637  +237  233.86  
4  Chris Warren  Grants Pass, Ore   7   1624  +224  232.00  
5  Rhino Page  Topeka, Kan   7   1595  +195  227.86  
6  Brian Kretzer  Dayton, Ohio   7   1589  +189  227.00  
7  Michael Machuga  Erie, Pa.   7   1583  +183  226.14  
8  Mitch Beasley  Arlington, Texas   7   1553  +153  221.86  
9  Robert Smith  Captain Cook, Hawaii   7   1551  +151  221.57  
10  Mika Koivuniemi  Hartland, Mich.   7   1549  +149  221.29  
11  Ken Simard  Greenville, S.C.   7   1539  +139  219.86  
12  Tommy Delutz Jr.  Flushing, N.Y.   7   1531  +131  218.71  
13  Chris Loschetter  Avon, Ohio   7   1529  +129  218.43  
14  Ryan Shafer  Horseheads, N.Y.   7   1529  +129  218.43  
15  Mike Scroggins  Amarillo, Texas   7   1528  +128  218.29  
16  PJ Haggerty  Clovis, Calif   7   1525  +125  217.86  
17  Doug Kent  Newark, N.Y.   7   1519  +119  217.00  
18  Bill O'Neill  Levittown, Pa.   7   1514  +114  216.29  
19  Walter Ray Williams Jr.  Ocala, Fla.   7   1512  +112  216.00  
20  Pete Weber  St. Ann, Mo.   7   1512  +112  216.00  
21  Eugene McCune  Munster, Ind.   7   1504  +104  214.86  
22  Riga Kalfas  Florence, Ky.   7   1504  +104  214.86  
23  Brad Angelo  Lockport, N.Y.   7   1492  +92  213.14  
24  Tommy Jones  Simpsonville, S.C.   7   1491  +91  213.00  
25  Jason Wojnar  Chicago   7   1487  +87  212.43  
26  Gregory Thompson Jr  Dayton, Ohio   7   1479  +79  211.29  
27  Ronnie Russell  Indianapolis   7   1476  +76  210.86  
28  Dave D'Entremont  Middleburg Heights, Ohio   7   1472  +72  210.29  
29  Mike DeVaney  Temecula, Calif.   7   1467  +67  209.57  
30  Troy Wollenbecker  Miami   7   1466  +66  209.43  
31  Brian Himmler  Cincinnati   7   1466  +66  209.43  
32  Dino Castillo  Carrollton, Texas   7   1460  +60  208.57  
33  Chad Kloss  Greenfield, Wis.   7   1459  +59  208.43  
34  Sean Swanson  Springfield, Mo.   7   1453  +53  207.57  
35  Edward VanDaniker Jr  Essex, Md   7   1451  +51  207.29  
36  Steve Jaros  Yorkville, Ill.   7   1450  +50  207.14  
37  Humberto Vazquez  San Pedro, Mexico   7   1439  +39  205.57  
38  Danny Wiseman  Baltimore   7   1439  +39  205.57  
39  Curtis Woods Jr.  Santa Rosa, Calif.   7   1436  +36  205.14  
40  Joe Ciccone  Buffalo, N.Y.   7   1436  +36  205.14  
41  Michael Fagan  Patchogue, N.Y.   7   1435  +35  205.00  
42  Bobby Stives*  El Paso, Texas   7   1435  +35  205.00  
43  Stevie Weber  Chalmette, La   7   1421  +21  203.00  
44  Ritchie Allen  Columbia, S.C.   7   1418  +18  202.57  
45  Norm Duke  Clermont, Fla.   7   1418  +18  202.57  
46  Mike Edwards  Tulsa, Okla.   7   1412  +12  201.71  
47  Brian LeClair  Athens, N.Y.   7   1407  +7  201.00  
48  Corey Husted  Clackamas, Ore   7   1404  +4  200.57  
49  Patrick Allen  Wesley Chapel, Fla.   7   1398  -2  199.71  
50  Tom Baker  King, N.C.   7   1396  -4  199.43  
51  Mike Wolfe  New Albany, Ind.   7   1394  -6  199.14  
52  Parker Bohn III  Jackson, N.J.   7   1390  -10  198.57  
53  David Leverage  Peoria, Ariz.   7   1390  -10  198.57  
54  Billy Oatman  Chicago   7   1384  -16  197.71  
55  Jim Tomek Jr.  Camp Hill, Pa.   7   1380  -20  197.14  
56  Mike Mineman  Belleville, Ill.   7   1367  -33  195.29  
57  Mark Scroggins  Amarillo, Texas   7   1349  -51  192.71  
58  Edward Rede  Las Cruces, N.M.   7   1342  -58  191.71  
59  Steve Harman  Indianapolis   7   1339  -61  191.29  
60  George Gaucin  El Paso, Texas   7   1327  -73  189.57  
61  Todd Book  Cantonment, Fla   7   1326  -74  189.43  
62  Ryan Ciminelli  Cheektowaga, N.Y.   7   1321  -79  188.71  
63  Lee Vanderhoef  Greenville, S.C.   7   1281  -119  183.00  
64  Michael Haugen Jr.  Cave Creek, Ariz.   7   1278  -122  182.57  


Edited on 2/7/2008 4:06 PM
Logged

 

sdbowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4066
Re: Bayer Classic Round of 64 - Block 1
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2008, 01:58:21 PM »
Wow Parker is way down towards the bottom wonder what went on there.
--------------------
Brunswick
Kyle
Logged

Borincano

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1181
Re: Bayer Classic Round of 64 - Block 1
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2008, 03:07:16 PM »
New standing with 7 games
Logged

Borincano

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1181
Re: Bayer Classic Round of 64 - Block 1
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2008, 03:08:45 PM »
Oil Pattern SHARK


This pattern forces bowlers to play deep inside the center of the lanes, like sharks that troll the depths of the ocean.
Tournament Schedule and Notes Pattern and Lane Conditioner:
Shark with Brunswick Absolute Control

 
Logged

actsbowler21

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 293
Re: Bayer Classic Round of 64 - Block 1
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2008, 03:12:38 PM »
copy and paste are both your friends
--------------------
Justin Buford

Logged

sdbowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4066
Re: Bayer Classic Round of 64 - Block 1
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2008, 03:19:03 PM »
quote:
quote:
Wow Parker is way down towards the bottom wonder what went on there.
--------------------
Brunswick
Kyle
shark! duh!



Wow excuse me. I just have never seen Parker that far down is all. That's what I was getting at ok.
--------------------
Brunswick
Kyle
Logged

novawagonmaster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4279
Re: Bayer Classic Round of 64 - Block 1
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2008, 03:41:19 PM »
I will always be amazed at the varied approaches to the sport of bowling. Look how different WRW and PDW play the game, yet they are both at 216.00. You could not have two guys who play the lanes more different. It's all about finding a line that works for you and repeating.
--------------------
Jon (in Ohio)

Logged

Joe Jr

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2776
Re: Bayer Classic Round of 64 - Block 1
« Reply #7 on: February 07, 2008, 03:57:54 PM »
quote:
quote:
thanks for posting this! i didnt know where else to go to see results!


Pba.com


Sarcasm...
--------------------
My Vid
Formerly Brunswick Lefty & Richard Cranium

Quote from Conspirator300/Chris-m:
And yeah, I do know it all.. I don't spend 30+ hours a week learning more about bowling for my heatlh... I do it so I know more than all of you.. which I do. (besides the random few that are staffers/work in the bowling business.. which that population is decreasing little by little)
Logged

Myrrodin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: Bayer Classic Round of 64 - Block 1
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2008, 03:58:45 PM »
quote:
I will always be amazed at the varied approaches to the sport of bowling. Look how different WRW and PDW play the game, yet they are both at 216.00. You could not have two guys who play the lanes more different. It's all about finding a line that works for you and repeating.
--------------------
Jon (in Ohio)



Not to take away from the fact that you can throw the ball a lot of different ways, but I am pretty irked about the PBA oil patterns this year.  It seems like they are morphing them too much to allow everybody to play on them.  I like seeing some variety of players on the telecast, but I think that this is going to far.  Morphing the shark so straighter players could still go straight is just annoying.  If you want to play straight on the shark, you should have to do what Norm did last year, and create a look for yourself, or do something nobody else can do.  There shouldn't be a line GIVEN to the best players in the world so they can play how they like (seriously, who thinks McCune is actually hooking the ball?).  Besides, there are patterns that tend to favor the straighter players, why not let the hook bowlers have their day?  I think the PBA patterns should do what they were originally intended for.  This gives straight a favorable lane condition, hook a favorable lane condition, and a couple for playing the lanes how you like.  Then we already have the patterns that are built to give a variety of looks, like the USBC Masters shot (and, therefore, the TOC shot) and the U.S. Open (play them how you like, everywhere is going to be tough).  I think that gives enough balance to the telecasts, we don't need to go fiddling with the patterns so everybody can play on everything.
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »