I've read most of the comments associated with this topic and came away somewhat amused by the replies. I may or may not agree with the poster as to whether Chris Barnes is a bowling choke artist as he seems to believe, or a bowling god that most of the respondants seem to believe. The difference to me is that the poster has claimed something and provided data to support it, where as the other side has mostly responded by verbal attacks and "please ignore this moron" posts but do not provide the data to support why CB should NOT be considered a choke artist.
Since most of you seem to have disregarded or ignored one reply let me offer it again:
Greenefam;
"Bowling seems to be the only sport where us mortals are not allowed to be judgemental of the national professionals. Baseball, basketball, football, golf, etc. I feel free to comment on someone choking or not coming up big when my team needed it. Why can't we do that with professional bowlers?
Is Chris Barnes much better than all of us? For sure. But does that mean we can't point out the obvious and that is that he has a record of not coming through when he needs to on TV? I don't think so.".
Makes a decent point.. Why are bowlers above such criticism simply because the complainer can't "bowl" at his level?
As always..Just my opinions..
Gallandro
--------------------
It is said that the meek shall inherit the Earth but they had better wait until the Violent have tamed it.