I have a question for some of you on here. We all know that Walter Ray has the most titles ever on the National Tour and many of them have come in the non exempt format. However, Earl Anthony had all of his titles in a non exempt format, meaning he had to qualify for each event and bowl more games.
What is more impressive to you? Really would it be fair to say someone like Tommy Jones who's titles have all come in the exempt era, if he were to surpass WRW, to say that Tommy is better or as good as WRW and EA have been?
I'm just curious to your thoughts on this.
--------------------
Formerly SGC300