These two organizations as a whole have not been who they should be. They have not done what they should do. The USBC should be focusing on governing the sport and the BPAA should be focusing on membership. Neither of them should be doing each others jobs, but they should be working together, doing what’s best for the game, GOVERNING and PROMOTING! I believe there could be some light at the end of the tunnel. The newer people in charge of these organizations COULD be the ones to make a difference. Let’s hope it’s not too late.
This statement kind of stuck out for me.
You have two organizations looking at things differently. Everything Machuga states above (minus the PBA issues) comes down these two oganizations having two different objectives.
How can the USBC govern a bowling center under the BPAA that buys pins that are easier to knock down, have flatter gutters, better side kicks, and what ever else put in to increase strikes?
What can they do?
Well they could deny any honor score shot in that center. What is that going to do. Every league in that center is going to be non-sanctioned. That's it. USBC would then have less members.
It took Ball Manufacturers several years to get this core to coverstock relationship down. Manufacturer's had no intent of telling the USBC what they were doing. Could the USBC ban all these bowling balls? You think ball manufacturers would stop producing these monster balls. People would have still bought them and formed non sanction leagues.
These two businesses (Ball Manufacturers and BPAA) were like a big freight train coming down the track. USBC couldn't stop them. Customers wanted better carry. They got it. If USBC did anything, the organization would have been done by 1995.
In my opinion all this technology is great (Balls, Lane Conditions, Pins, Pin Decks), but it all comes at a very high price. It costs too much now to bowl.
Right now bowling is out pricing itself. What was once a very affordable sport has become too much money for all of its participants. Bowlers, Bowling Centers, and ProShops.
SO IS THAT 270 GAME REALLY WORTH IT WHEN 30 YEARS AGO IT PROBABLY WOULD HAVE BEEN A 200.