win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: PBA Badger  (Read 20284 times)

avabob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2779
PBA Badger
« on: June 18, 2014, 03:50:19 PM »
Anyone watch the Badger show last night?  Let me first state that this not a slam on the young two hander who finished second.  I think the kid made a tremendous effort, and there aren't many guys who could execute they way he did while lofting as far down the lane. Having said that, this strategy brings up a huge problem that I would not like to deal with as a proprietor.  Part of the problem lies with being able to dull up the surfaces so much.  I have said for several years that we could deal with part of the lane break down problem if all balls had to be 4000 grit as a final finish.  Best solution would be to outlaw resin balls along with not allowing aggressive surface alterations.   

 

cisco1869

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 114
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #31 on: June 20, 2014, 09:38:07 PM »
Anyone watch the Badger show last night?  Let me first state that this not a slam on the young two hander who finished second.  I think the kid made a tremendous effort, and there aren't many guys who could execute they way he did while lofting as far down the lane. Having said that, this strategy brings up a huge problem that I would not like to deal with as a proprietor.  Part of the problem lies with being able to dull up the surfaces so much.  I have said for several years that we could deal with part of the lane break down problem if all balls had to be 4000 grit as a final finish.  Best solution would be to outlaw resin balls along with not allowing aggressive surface alterations.   

Since they give the different patterns different volumes in different areas along with different lengths, it would seem they want them to break down.  With the lighter volume of badger, did they really intend it to hold up?

cheech

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1360
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #32 on: June 20, 2014, 09:49:43 PM »
Its not that the guys are doing anything wrong or illegal.  The point is that we have allowed the equipment to become so strong that it alters the condition in a manner unintended.  It is sad that technology has allowed us to have lane machines that can put out challenging yet fair conditions, but the balls basically destroy that pattern so quickly.  Why bother owning a 38K lane machine when the balls blow the shot up in 20 minutes of practice.  Just mop a bunch of oil on the lane, because they blow a hole in it in no time.  Again, not a slam on the bowlers, and this has nothing to do with the scoring level.  A more competitive environment where your success is less dependent on the guy you cross behind would be good for the game. 
personally lane play strategy and lane breakdown is part of bowling competitively and always has been but...

there is an easy solution to this......put more volume down. it is a constant struggle between lane patterns and balls that can blow it up or overcome it or however you want to put it. take any pattern you want to put down and add 5 or 10mLs to it and the strongest super soakers will not blow it up for 10+ games in tournament play. yes it will be more expensive but thats the cost of "preserving the integrity" of bowling. i have seen this theory put into practice at individual tournaments and the pattern played true for the first 8-10 games. it was tough, people complained but the real shot makers still rose to the top.

northface28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3333
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #33 on: June 20, 2014, 09:50:54 PM »
Anyone watch the Badger show last night?  Let me first state that this not a slam on the young two hander who finished second.  I think the kid made a tremendous effort, and there aren't many guys who could execute they way he did while lofting as far down the lane. Having said that, this strategy brings up a huge problem that I would not like to deal with as a proprietor.  Part of the problem lies with being able to dull up the surfaces so much.  I have said for several years that we could deal with part of the lane break down problem if all balls had to be 4000 grit as a final finish.  Best solution would be to outlaw resin balls along with not allowing aggressive surface alterations.   

Since they give the different patterns different volumes in different areas along with different lengths, it would seem they want them to break down.  With the lighter volume of badger, did they really intend it to hold up?

Its 52 feet, but its light volume, of course it breaks down, not to mention they were on HPLs, already high friction. Now I know the old fashioned purists will say "flood em, 52 feet, flat, heavy volume". Ive learned we cannot take these people serious, seeing scores of 152-148 is "bowling" to them, if its not end-over-end ball roll between first and second arrow, its not "bowling".
NLMB 150 Dream Team
#NoTalking
#HellaBandz

northface28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3333
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #34 on: June 20, 2014, 09:53:11 PM »
Its not that the guys are doing anything wrong or illegal.  The point is that we have allowed the equipment to become so strong that it alters the condition in a manner unintended.  It is sad that technology has allowed us to have lane machines that can put out challenging yet fair conditions, but the balls basically destroy that pattern so quickly.  Why bother owning a 38K lane machine when the balls blow the shot up in 20 minutes of practice.  Just mop a bunch of oil on the lane, because they blow a hole in it in no time.  Again, not a slam on the bowlers, and this has nothing to do with the scoring level.  A more competitive environment where your success is less dependent on the guy you cross behind would be good for the game. 
personally lane play strategy and lane breakdown is part of bowling competitively and always has been but...

there is an easy solution to this......put more volume down. it is a constant struggle between lane patterns and balls that can blow it up or overcome it or however you want to put it. take any pattern you want to put down and add 5 or 10mLs to it and the strongest super soakers will not blow it up for 10+ games in tournament play. yes it will be more expensive but thats the cost of "preserving the integrity" of bowling. i have seen this theory put into practice at individual tournaments and the pattern played true for the first 8-10 games. it was tough, people complained but the real shot makers still rose to the top.

More volume? More surface. Ive had the honor to practice with some of the better collegiate players in the country and its nothing for them to get a 220 grit pad, lean on a ball and blow up a spot on the lane.
NLMB 150 Dream Team
#NoTalking
#HellaBandz

cheech

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1360
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #35 on: June 20, 2014, 10:21:51 PM »
more surface? more volume. like i said its a constant struggle between lane oils and bowling ball technology. i have also bowled with very good collegiate bowlers and know what the elite players are capable of if needed. i dont know exact numbers that are needed to combat the problem people seem to have with balls breaking down patterns but when less than a shot of alcohol of lane oil is needed to make a heavy oil ball skate for 60ft i find it hard to believe it cant easily be done.  like i said i have no problem with lane play strategy and pattern breakdown im just trying to play devils advocate but bowl on a 42' pattern with 35mL of volume and it will hold up for a while. if 35mLs isnt enough go to 40 or 45mLs. there will be a point where the 180 grit super covers wont be able to breakdown a pattern in a game or two. people just have to be willing to spend however much in extra oil to oil the lanes

northface28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3333
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #36 on: June 20, 2014, 10:37:08 PM »
more surface? more volume. like i said its a constant struggle between lane oils and bowling ball technology. i have also bowled with very good collegiate bowlers and know what the elite players are capable of if needed. i dont know exact numbers that are needed to combat the problem people seem to have with balls breaking down patterns but when less than a shot of alcohol of lane oil is needed to make a heavy oil ball skate for 60ft i find it hard to believe it cant easily be done.  like i said i have no problem with lane play strategy and pattern breakdown im just trying to play devils advocate but bowl on a 42' pattern with 35mL of volume and it will hold up for a while. if 35mLs isnt enough go to 40 or 45mLs. there will be a point where the 180 grit super covers wont be able to breakdown a pattern in a game or two. people just have to be willing to spend however much in extra oil to oil the lanes

Now you're going in circles. You start pulling this crap, left handers are locked out, they won't show up. Low rev players, they're staying home. Tweeners, no chance, they're staying home. The older players (seniors) who seem to be beating the drum the loudest for using more oil, they won't hit the headpin. Hell, in regular league play, these old farts plead and beg for more oil, over wall them and give them their wish? They wash out every other frame. The only real answer is do what you do best, hooking it, throwing it straight, etc, just repeat shots and stop crying or looking for ways to bring someone down to your skill level or scoring pace.
NLMB 150 Dream Team
#NoTalking
#HellaBandz

EL3MCNEIL

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #37 on: June 21, 2014, 02:10:20 AM »
The cream rises to the top. More oil or longer lasting oil will benefit some, and hurt others. The best bowler is the one that can repeat shots, and figures out the best way to play the lanes in the moment. Figuring out how to adjust to the playing environment matters in all sports. So, no need to whimper and whine about the lane conditions, or balls with too much surface. Figure out how to knock all ten pins down with your balls on the surface that you play on and you win. If you can't figure out how to knockem down and the other guy does, he beat you that day. You loose. It's really that simple.

The beauty of it is that we all can roll the ball down the lane and knock ten pins down, no matter what the lane surface is or ball chosen. Over time, the best win the most.

So, for all of you crying because of the lane conditions, or balls having too much surface or left handers having an advantage or two handers having an advantage, send me your mailing address, I'll send you a hanky.

This statement should explain it all. Stop crying about it and just BOWL. Changing something of this nature because the individual doesn't like it will ruin the sport. If you don't like it, just don't bowl. Other than that, adapt to the conditions, throw the ball(s) and knock the pins down!!!
"Nothing is real, everything is permitted"
-Assassin's Creed

JOE FALCO

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6298
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #38 on: June 21, 2014, 10:48:17 AM »
 The older players (seniors) who seem to be beating the drum the loudest for using more oil, they won't hit the headpin. Hell, in regular league play, these old farts plead and beg for more oil, over wall them and give them their wish? They wash out every other frame.

My suggestion to you: Why don't you ask your Center to put the condition used for Seniors out for your League. Do it for a month and lets see the reaction from your league bowlers!
RIP Thongprincess/Sawbones!

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #39 on: June 21, 2014, 02:16:56 PM »
House shots ruin the shot for bowlers.

That being said, Brian is the same guy that won a regional with a rubber ball. He's got game.

badbeard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #40 on: June 22, 2014, 11:39:46 AM »
After reading all of this comment on the Badger show.I want to say my 2 cents worth.
 It was great to see a new bowler do so well! But old school still won. Did you get that rocket to the pocket won !!!
 I bowl with seniors they want more oil because they have slowed down because of age and would love to use stronger new balls. But they cannot and guess what someday each of you will be there and want more oil.Come play with the seniors they use plastic, rubber, 25 year old urethane or any thing else they have from the past. Yes they play 2nd arrow and down the middle and any where else the have to the get to the pocket. And the pattern breaks down different every day depends on who you bowl. Know why? Because they are old school backup balls full rollers suitcase releases they have it all. Years ago I complained to my older partner about how the mixed league bowlers messed up my shot. He said to me. YOU ARE A SCRATCH BOWLER SO SHUT UP AND BOWL! I wanted a change so I joined a travel league lots of different houses. Different lanes different ths and different bowlers all men
young, old,short and tall they all compete don't complain to much and they all are trying to learn how to bowl better. Guys try to embrace change, respect those who have come before us and above all have fun make your self a better bowler. Last Thursday night I bowled on a  men's trio 4 game summer league and my team left 7 7-10 splits.
I had 3 of them but we pressed on and won all 4 games as the other team was playing on the same pair same conditions. Who would have thought both teams struggled. That said lets bowl. Only time I see lots of oil is nationals. Bowled in 14 different houses last year.

tommyboy74

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1832
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #41 on: June 22, 2014, 12:40:52 PM »
House shots ruin the shot for bowlers.

That being said, Brian is the same guy that won a regional with a rubber ball. He's got game.

Here it is.  Valenta won his first regional using a Brunswick Black Beauty
http://www.11thframe.com/news/article/5946
Current Ball Arsenal
Heavy:
MOTIV Jackal Legacy
MOTIV Mythic Jackal

Med-Heavy:
MOTIV Trident Odyssey
MOTIV Forge Fire
MOTIV Covert Revolt

Medium:
MOTIV VIP ExJ Sigma
MOTIV Sigma Sting
MOTIV Pride Solid

Medium-Light
MOTIV Venom Shock
MOTIV Tribal Fire

avabob

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2779
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #42 on: June 22, 2014, 05:14:46 PM »
I have to chuckle reading some of the comments about the old geezers, since I am one of them.  I won a couple of senior tourneys on higher volume 47 ft patterns a year or so ago.  Averaged about 225 doing it.  Another one I averaged 230, and didn't lead the qualifying.  Funny thing was I was talking to a very good young regional player after one of them, and he joked that it was a good thing the kids weren't bowling, because they would have blown up the pattern so bad nobody could hit it.  He was not far from the truth. 

As I said in a previous post, none of my comments are sour grapes.  I have had more success as a senior than I could have ever dreamed. At my age their is no pattern that I could compete with the kids on, and there shouldn't be.  I just feel that technology caused some problems that detract from the physical integrity ( not scoring ) of the game.  New lane machine technology has given us a chance to control some of it, and oils have helped.  I just think it is too bad that we cant make minor adjustments to ball surfaces to make the patterns hold up a bit better, and not allow guys to just snow plow a shot in any way they want.  Imagine in golf if the pros had balls that allowed them to make any green play slow, no matter how much they tried to toughen them up.  How long do you think those balls would last.       

Jorge300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6407
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #43 on: June 23, 2014, 01:06:53 PM »
avabob,
     Your golf ball/greens analogy would work, if every golf ball that rolled across the green changed the surface of the green in some way. The fact is it doesn't, so the analogy is moot. Every ball thrown, whether at 4000 grit, 500 grit, or 80 grit changes the oil pattern. Every ball thrown, whether it's resin, particle, urethane or rubber, changes the oil pattern. After 10-15 mins of practice, any oil pattern will be different then when it started, in some way. Whether it's oil getting sucked into the new balls, whether it's oil evaporating under the TV lights, whether it's oil getting pushed down from plastic or urethane balls being thrown, the pattern will change. Sorry, I don't see your point of detracting from the physical intgrety of the game. What do you mean by that? Is it because no one else could play like Valenta was playing? If so, then again I ask, why wasn't anyone complaining when Robert Smith did this during his prime? I'm not trying to be an @ss, I really don't get your point.
Jorge300

Urethane Game

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1304
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #44 on: June 23, 2014, 01:16:15 PM »
Jorge300, I believe he said imagine....

Lanes change.  Yes.  But to intentionally affect the outcome by using a ball in practice that you would never use in competition is less than sporting.  Whether it is Valenta, Duke or Daugherty, it is less than ethical regardless of what the rules say.

Jorge300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6407
Re: PBA Badger
« Reply #45 on: June 23, 2014, 02:31:54 PM »
Urethane Game,
     So let's imagine a bowling ball that hooks a ton, but doesn't change the oil one bit....problem solved, right? You can imagine all you want, I like to speak about reality.
 
     As far as Valenta's tactics, it's been part of the game for a while now. Did you think Chris Barnes could naturally play the gutter on Shark 4-5 years ago (or whenever it was he won doing that)? He threw practice there and burned up a shot that only he could play consistently. Valenta did the same thing, basically. But by doing it he wound up hurting the other players. Why is giving yourself the best chance to win unethical? I called it from Match 1....I thought Mika should have moved right and tried to play straight-up Valenta's breakpoint, or just outside of it. I thought Kent should have done the same. Weber couldn't do that but he had a good look and got a few bad breaks, and then stuck on the spare to hand the match to Valenta. Only O'Neil made that move and he won. It's not like Valenta blew away Mika or Weber doing this. He got lucky against Mika and the final score showed a wide margin of victory, Valenta's shots didn't earn him that score. He was very close with Weber, until Weber missed that spare cause he stuck. Again, it wasn't his skill that gave him the final margin of victory. From my standpoint, Valenta tried a tactic that only worked because the other bowlers tried to fit their game into his tactic instead of doing something to give themselves a better chance to win.
Jorge300