win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: brunswickinsiders match commentary  (Read 936 times)

vilecanards

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
brunswickinsiders match commentary
« on: January 06, 2008, 04:46:25 PM »
don't know how many folks have dug deep enough to find this commentary on the matches from the ball rep's perspective?

http://brunswickinsiders.com/PBA%20Tournaments/09Reno/tvshowreno.htm#Match_3
--------------------
r.k.wolfe

Edited on 1/7/2008 1:48 AM

 

vilecanards

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: brunswickinsiders match commentary
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2008, 12:47:31 AM »
kind of why they call it brunswickinsider, I guess???
--------------------
r.k.wolfe

grizfan

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
Re: brunswickinsiders match commentary
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2008, 07:36:13 AM »
What part was erroneous?

vilecanards

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: brunswickinsiders match commentary
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2008, 11:22:21 AM »
didn't say that anything was erroneous.... just found it an interesting read from the perspective of someone who is a consultant to many of the bowlers, plus it does tell whether or not a strike was flush, light-mixer and how it carried, and the spares that were left when they didn't strike. I just found it to be interesting reading, and thought others might also....
--------------------
r.k.wolfe

vilecanards

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
Re: brunswickinsiders match commentary
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2008, 11:24:37 AM »
just quoting an example......
"Patrick thinking about making a ball change. Lost concentration and whiffed the 5 pin. Tommy out of commercial got the light hit strike. Tommy's carry is definitely the difference today "

--------------------
r.k.wolfe