BallReviews
General Category => PBA => Topic started by: Hogsharley on April 11, 2008, 01:27:10 PM
-
http://www.pba.com/news/feature.asp?ID=745
quote:
The PBA East Region awarded Ray Edwards (Middle Island, N.Y.) the Player of the Year award after he led the East Region Point Rankings although he turned down his exemption. Edwards won four titles and led the region with $17,952 in season earnings.
I heard from someone who bowls with him that he was going to turn it down. After reading about current exempt's situation, I'm not totally surpised. I know that Ray does have a well paying job. He didn't do too well with his last exemption in 2006-07 and lost it. I guess he could do better with regional's (almost $18k) and still not worry about losing his job because of the tour. He can make more money as a weekend warrior without all the large expenses of being on tour.
--------------------
3 holes of fun!!
-
That's probally about 8, maybe 9 events tops. I think the PBA would frown if he tried to do that. The PBA wants someone who can make most, if not all the events.
--------------------
3 holes of fun!!
-
quote:
That's probally about 8, maybe 9 events tops. I think the PBA would frown if he tried to do that. The PBA wants someone who can make most, if not all the events.
--------------------
3 holes of fun!! 
They should market the sport better and get the low guys on the totem pole more than the equivelant of a $10/hr job at Best Buy.
--------------------
http://www.myspace.com/rlrussell
The artist formerly known as "jabroni"
-
I'm sorry if guys like Ray read and know where I'm coming from. It's the hard facts and truth unfortunately.
Edited on 4/12/2008 9:31 AM
-
quote:
I'm sorry if guys like Ray read and know where I'm coming from. It's the hard facts and truth unfortunately.
Edited on 4/12/2008 9:31 AM
Have you made any decisions yet? Which way are you leaning?
--------------------
3 holes of fun!!
-
Unless your a top 10 guy on the national tour it's probably best to stay a regional player and have a full time job.
-
I need to verify it but I believe you have to bowl a certain number of stops to remain exempt throughout the year so you just can't pick a choose a few.
-
I hope that Adidas thing goes through. I think a real big name sports company needs to sponsor the PBA for it to get anywhere close to where the PGA is. Don't get me wrong, I don't think that the PBA will be that big. All they need is to be able to have big enough prizes to give even the bottom exempt player something like 50,000 after expenses.
--------------------
Always be sincere, even when you don't mean it
Known Cell pimp
-
This is why I feel we should increase the Sanction fees $5.00 to try to save the PBA. It is sad that you need to win a title just to earn more than an average Joe job pays.
I remember when I was a kid you could live for a year if you just made the show, now you would be lucky to make it another month unless you win.
This is just sad, it should be the opertunity of a lifetime, but instead it is a joke.
-
About the dumbest thing ever I ever heard!!
quote:
This is why I feel we should increase the Sanction fees $5.00 to try to save the PBA
Edited on 4/12/2008 6:49 PM
-
quote:
]This is why I feel we should increase the Sanction fees $5.00 to try to save the PBA
I feel that the PBA has to figure out how to save itself. It's not up to the USBC to step in and save the PBA. The USBC has it's own problems and they are trying to keep the sanctioning fees down. Most people feel that the fees are too high already and now the USBC is cutting down honor awards on top of that.
--------------------
3 holes of fun!!
-
The reason the USBC is cuttting back on Honor Score awards is that they have become a joke. Until some integrity is put back into the game, whether through restrictions on lane conditions or rolling back ball technology, the Honor Score awards are practically meaningless anyway. How many stainless steel 300 rings do you need anyway???
-
quote:
The reason the USBC is cuttting back on Honor Score awards is that they have become a joke.
Do you really believe that? I think it all boils down to $$'s. Like I said earlier, they (USBC) are looking at cutting costs. If they keep on giving rings out each year to high average players, they will have to raise sanctioning fees.
Hey, someone has to pay for their move from Wisconsin to Texas. Let it be the guys who have a draw full of rings.
--------------------
3 holes of fun!!
-
I personally am willing to pay a higher sanction fee. I would pay it even if it went up $15 or $20. Seriously, it is a one time fee for the year.
--------------------
Always be sincere, even when you don't mean it
Known Cell pimp
-
Yeah - I believe it - and it has become a joke. Of course - cost is a factor, and what I didn't state in my first post was that the two are obviously related. Since it's relatively easy to achieve these Honor Score awards, there are far too many of them earned for the USBC to keep sending them out for each and every honor score.
-
You can't be that dumb??????
quote:
I personally am willing to pay a higher sanction fee. I would pay it even if it went up $15 or $20. Seriously, it is a one time fee for the year.
--------------------
Always be sincere, even when you don't mean it
Known Cell pimp
-
Ed - even though $15-20 might be a bit much (though I would certainly pay it), what's wrong with an extra $5 from each bowler? I actually think that a $3 increase would suffice, considering the number of people that pay the fee. With that extra money, the PBA could at least up the guaranteed money the guys will get each week, which would make it feasible to actually be on tour.
Why do you think everybody who agrees with that is stupid?
--------------------
The Right Approach Pro Shop, Charlotte, NC
-
quote:
Ed - even though $15-20 might be a bit much (though I would certainly pay it), what's wrong with an extra $5 from each bowler? I actually think that a $3 increase would suffice, considering the number of people that pay the fee. With that extra money, the PBA could at least up the guaranteed money the guys will get each week, which would make it feasible to actually be on tour.
Why do you think everybody who agrees with that is stupid?
--------------------
The Right Approach Pro Shop, Charlotte, NC
It's not up the the USBC to save the PBA. The PBA has to find ways to save itself.
--------------------
3 holes of fun!!
-
If you polled most of the casual league bowlers I bet a lot of them would not want to fees increase to help the PBA. Heck I'd bet some wouldn't know what the PBA is anyway.
-
quote:
If you polled most of the casual league bowlers I bet a lot of them would not want to fees increase to help the PBA. Heck I'd bet some wouldn't know what the PBA is anyway.
Hell, most league guys don't want the fee's to increase when the money can go right back in their pocket at the end of the year. The problem with bowling is the wealth of higher intelligence that makes up most of the sport.
Have you ever seem the character on the Simpson's named, "Slack Jawed Yokel"?
Edited on 4/14/2008 0:53 AM
-
Deathbloom,
The PBA Rulebook has a section dealing with the obligations of Exempt players. They must bowl a certain number of events, I believe 15 or 16 of the schedule. They also have obligations to bowl Pro Am events each week. I know this has become a problem for some exempt players struggling on tour. If they don't make the first cut, they are done bowling Thursday evening, however, they are obligated to bowl the Pro Ams that do not take place until Saturday. This schedule is terrible and makes life on the road that much more difficult for the up and coming players trying to make it.
But to answer your initial question, bowling a limited schedule as an exempt player isn't possible based on PBA rules.
-
Some agree and disagree about the 3 dollar increase to help the PBA. One way to solve that would be making it optional. I suggested the 3 dollar increase in another post and would have no problem paying it.
I really don't understand how some of you who disagree are so cheap? I know it's not your job to save the PBA. Why are you a usbc member? Do you just not care if their's a pro tour in this sport? How much does 3 dollars a year come out to each week?
I will never be a PBA member because I don't have the time. However, I love the sport of bowling and enjoy watching the pro's on TV. I think it would really suck if the pro tour no longer existed. If I can donate a lousy 3 dollars a year to help keep the tour going strong and may help bring more sponsors, then i'm all for it!
-
quote:
I really don't understand how some of you who disagree are so cheap? I know it's not your job to save the PBA. Why are you a usbc member? Do you just not care if their's a pro tour in this sport? How much does 3 dollars a year come out to each week?
It has absolutely NOTHING to do with being cheap. When are you going to come to terms with that, as opposed to insulting bowlers who don't agree with your theory??
Why does the USBC and/or its bowlers have to save the PBA? Has it ever occured that maybe just maybe it's the responsibility of the "brass" of the PBA?
--------------------
Joeyd
Shop www.buddiesproshop.com
http://joeyd.bowlspace.com
AIM - JoeydfromNB11
-
quote:
quote:
I really don't understand how some of you who disagree are so cheap? I know it's not your job to save the PBA. Why are you a usbc member? Do you just not care if their's a pro tour in this sport? How much does 3 dollars a year come out to each week?
It has absolutely NOTHING to do with being cheap. When are you going to come to terms with that, as opposed to insulting bowlers who don't agree with your theory??
Why does the USBC and/or its bowlers have to save the PBA? Has it ever occured that maybe just maybe it's the responsibility of the "brass" of the PBA?
--------------------
Joeyd
Shop www.buddiesproshop.com
http://joeyd.bowlspace.com
AIM - JoeydfromNB11
I'm not trying to insult bowlers that don't agree with my theory. I'm trying to understand why some would be SO AGAINST 3 dollars of their dues going to the PBA prize fund? I say this because almost everyone wastes 1 cent per day! That's what it would be, 1 cent a day, actually not even that much! That's like 25 cents per month to help out the PBA! Like I said i'm not trying to insult anyone who doesn't like my theory or idea but why wouldn't a bowler be willing to donate 25 cents a month to the PBA prize fund?
I am just baffled how some could be so against dontaing 25 cents per month because they feel the PBA should not get any help from the USBC and it's members?
As a bowler, I like watching the PBA. I also want it to stay around and if a 25 cent piece per month will help it out then i'm for it! Hell I could probably find 25 cents on the ground outside every month.
Edited on 4/14/2008 3:23 PM
-
I have no problem paying the extra $3 to see the PBA continue. Just try selling that to the guys in my league. There would be an uproar. They already have a problem with the USBC cutting awards and sanctioning fees just keep going up. The USBC has already left a bad taste in most bowlers mouths. My sanctioning fees are $19 and most people feel that they get nothing for it.
The "PBA Donation" check box is the way to go. For those who don't mind paying an extra fee, maybe the PBA should go Pay per View.
--------------------
3 holes of fun!!
-
quote:
if the pba is struggling to get viewers now, how do you think their viewer numbers are going to be if they go pay per view? even lower is my guess
It was a bad joke. I know that Pay per view wouldn't even want to entertain the idea.
--------------------
3 holes of fun!!
-
Maybe Obama(Mr. 37) will bail out the PBA and raise our taxes. Hey, don't complain. I mean it's only a few more bucks.
-
quote:
Why does the USBC and/or its bowlers have to save the PBA? Has it ever occured that maybe just maybe it's the responsibility of the "brass" of the PBA?
The PBA brass has put up close to 100 million to save the pba and they don't even bowl. As bowlers don't we owe anything back to the sport?
You are right we don't get anything for our sanction fee as it is, but at least we could see where our pba donation is going on tv every week. As it stands we are tossing away $19 a year for nothing, no lane inspections, 300 and 900 rings being given away like crackerjack toys to people who bowl on lanes so easy Obama could average 200+ on them.
-
Another thing to remember about the $3 idea, the vast majority of bowlers do not watch and have no interest in the PBA. An optional contribution would be fine, but to raise the dues to help an organization the vast majority of bowlers don't care about would hurt the sport.
-
I think EdK rode the short bus to br.com today!
--------------------
*TEAM STORM*
-
quote:
I think EdK rode the short bus to br.com today!
--------------------
*TEAM STORM*
I don't even think hes allowed on it...
--------------------
Throwing hambones since 2005.
www.myspace.com/nestes12
-
quote:
quote:
I think EdK rode the short bus to br.com today!
--------------------
*TEAM STORM*
I don't even think hes allowed on it...
--------------------
Throwing hambones since 2005.
www.myspace.com/nestes12
I know if I was the one driving he wouldn't be.
--------------------
*TEAM STORM*
-
Being a secretary of a Men's League, there is no way I could convince my bowlers to pay more money to a governing body that just keeps taking their money and than giving even less for their money.
I don't see how league bowlers paying an extra $3.00 is going to save the PBA. I agree with the one poster that said it's up to the " PBA Brass" to come up with better marketing plans
--------------------
Dale Williams
Columbia 300 Utah Amateur Staff
-
pay per view? pba would have to pay people to watch
if the pba can't stand on its own, then it should fall. simple as that
-
Call me crazy or whatever but I thought it was a poor idea to allow regional point winners to be aloud on the exempt tour. Give more spots open to the tour trials and give more people a chance from other countries to join the tour. With the crummy payouts and making it difficult for someone from a foreign country to be on the tour we may never have another Amleto on tour again. Mika is last of it's kind.
-
You know this thing about us league bowlers bailing out the pros has been beat to death. I am opposed to it , league bowlers should not be mandated to pay the salaries of the pros. I say pros because someone else is going to come up with the bright idea to include the ladies in so before you know it we'll be paying more of our sanctioning fees for salaries then for getting sanctioned. While you're at it why not increase all the USBC officials salary they probably aren't making enough. I like the pros but if there isn't enough interest from sponsors to save it then it should go under like any other business, because that is exactly what it is
--------------------
Carl
-
Shouldn't some our fee's be used for helping to promote and grow the sport of bowling? I not saying that we need to pay exorbitant fees to USBC but the real question is do we as bowlers want to see the sport grow, if you don't then the answer is simple continue at "staus quo", if you do then the answer is not as simple.
-
I can't find the figures, but apparently our sanction fees are being used to revive the womens tour. Shouldn't at least the same amount go to the men's tour.
--------------------
Charter Member FOS
Have Balls - Will Travel