win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)  (Read 2302 times)

SVstar34

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5465
Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« on: December 06, 2009, 04:28:13 AM »
Wow. what a great set of bowling. Two classy guys end up in the finals and a roll-off decided it all.

Congratz to Jack on the great bowling and it wont be much longer for Fagan
--------------------
My Arsenal:
Rogue Cell (coming soon)
Bounty(4.5 x 4.75 Fresh 1000 Abralon)
Twisted Fury(5 x 4 500 Abralon + Reacta Shine)
Blue Vibe(5 x 5 4000 Abralon + Reacta Shine)

Logged

 

shelley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9655
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #1 on: December 06, 2009, 12:46:12 PM »
It was a great show.  I think those were the highest scoring games since the WSOB started.  Helps to get out of the track area.  And that messenger that just stopped dead in its tracks.

SH
Logged

sirius

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 15
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #2 on: December 06, 2009, 12:48:02 PM »
Great Show all around, I'm pumped to BOWL
Logged

Hogsharley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3389
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2009, 01:24:12 PM »
Really nice finals. Great drama. I was rooting for Fagan but it was nice to see Jurek break that very long drought.

Side note: Great pin action Fagan was getting on shooting those 10 pins. I think he got every 10 pin to bouce back onto the pin deck. His last one would have also took out the 7 pin.
--------------------
3 holes of fun!!
Logged

Dave_in_Rio_Rancho

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 471
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2009, 02:28:41 PM »
Either it was the best show in quite awhile or my standards of excellence have changed - I think it was a pretty good show
Logged

tonybowls

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1019
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2009, 04:35:04 PM »
Best show so far. Jurek's the man.
Logged

Stickythumbhole

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2009, 08:09:18 PM »
Much better show. Nice that they had a playable condition for a change.
Logged

ImBackInTheGame

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1022
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2009, 08:24:55 PM »
Very entertaining for once!
--------------------
Arsenal:
Roto-Grip Cell Pearl (4000 abralon)
Lane #1 Chainsaw (2000 + Secret Sauce)
Lane #1 Dynamo X2

F.O.S. Member
Logged

rvmark

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 803
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #8 on: December 07, 2009, 04:23:15 AM »
Great for Jack to finally come through with the win.  

Also props to Kelly for getting up and taking care of business in the 10th with the game on the line.

Mark
Logged

Danes07

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #9 on: December 07, 2009, 04:29:15 AM »
I couldn't have been more happy to see Jack finally break through and win again.

I've bowled a couple of Pro-Ams with him and his one of the classiest guys I have ever met...just a true nice guy.

It was nice to see them have a playable condition.  Yeah, they had to be precise, but it was still playable and good shots got rewarded.
--------------------
University at Albany 2007
    -Let's Go Danes-

ROTO GRIP - King of Them All
STORM - The Bowlers Company

Harry E. Inglis 3/31/1915 - 2/3/2009
Logged

RaginCajun

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1036
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #10 on: December 07, 2009, 10:08:10 AM »
I think what made it an enjoyable final match was
the fact that Fagan was going for #1 and Jurek was
going for #2. Was not your Duke against Williams Jr
with a combined titles of 400 something. It surely
was nice to see Jurek beat the big nasty. Very good
show indeed.
--------------------
2nd place is only the first loser(John Force)

Logged
" Second Is Only The First Loser "

bowlerdawg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1933
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #11 on: December 07, 2009, 10:10:52 AM »
it was a good show, but it was nothing that the PBA did, it was because of the bowlers involved.

Two underdogs going into a roll off to determine the champ is entertaining, plus getting to see CDB lose again is always good
--------------------
X
Logged

mainzer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4405
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #12 on: December 07, 2009, 12:10:50 PM »
I loved seeing CDB lose she really blow that one, Kelly gave it to her then managed to get it back.
--------------------
"His Loyalty couldn't be bought at any price
but it could be rented remarkably cheaply"
-Inquisitor Allendyne-

Founding Father of the BR Inquisition

MainzerPower
Logged
"No one runs...from the conquerer "

MainzerPower

bighook69

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3395
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #13 on: December 07, 2009, 12:45:20 PM »
how accurate exactly is there CATS system?? Is there such an effect by the ball that both Kelly and CDB have almost the same rev rate (both around 250)... when clearly Kelly has significantly more than CDB? Also Jack's rev rate on CATS was around 350, while Fagan's was almost the exact same... when obviously Mike's rev rate is MUCH higher than Jack's. The only one that seemed believable was Wes being around 440.
Logged

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: Shark Championship (Spoiler for those who havent watched)
« Reply #14 on: December 07, 2009, 01:57:59 PM »
quote:
Speaking of CDB, was there a Strike Zone sighting yesterday?


Maxxx Zone

 
quote:
how accurate exactly is there CATS system?? Is there such an effect by the ball that both Kelly and CDB have almost the same rev rate (both around 250)... when clearly Kelly has significantly more than CDB? Also Jack's rev rate on CATS was around 350, while Fagan's was almost the exact same... when obviously Mike's rev rate is MUCH higher than Jack's. The only one that seemed believable was Wes being around 440.


You also have to take into consideration axis tilt.  Differences in axis tilt and rotation can account for differences in backend reaction.  I'm pretty sure Kelly has more axis tilt than CDB and JJ might have more than Fagan.
--------------------
Bowlingballreviews.com... Gone, but not forgotten. Wayback Machine - http://www.archive.org/web/web.php
Logged
Pages: [1] 2
« previous next »