BallReviews

General Category => PBA => Topic started by: K_Korner on April 01, 2004, 05:36:25 PM

Title: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: K_Korner on April 01, 2004, 05:36:25 PM
Justin Warhol Recently won a spot in the PBA Regional at Patchogue Bowl on March 4th, 2004.  He used an Ultimate Inferno drilled by The Perfect Fit.  He then bowled in the Regional and qualified 11th to make it into the finals.  In his first round of match play, he was leading 1-0. He seemed to be a lock to win the match, when the tournament director approached him in the middle of the second game, in which he was also leading.  he was told that the Master Wrister that he was wearing was not a PBA sponsored item.  He was forced to take it off and fined $100 for his actions.  He could not bowl properly after that because his wrist was weakened by the removal of the Wrister and wound up losing the match.  We then looked at the packaging for the Master Wrister and it had the PBA logo on it.  What does this mean?  Should he have been forced to take it off even though the packaging said "PBA sponsored item"?  We looked closer at the packaging and it said, "Copyright 2001."  Now whose fault is this?  Do we blame Master for not updating their packaging?  Justin was a first time PBA Regional bowler and the director had mentioned that the rules of the tournament were on-line and should be read before bowling.  What if someone doesn't have on-line access (There are still a few people without it)?  In conclusion, Justin lost the chance to maybe place higher in the tournament and collect a larger check.  
Bowling is Justin's life, that is his career, he is very good at it.  He is extremely down on bowling anymore PBA sponsored events.  To lose someone like this for the future of the tournament and the future of the PBA would be a disgrace because of something that was the fault of the Manufacturer.  Feedback please. Thanks for reading.

--------------------
WIN FREE STUFF! MONTHLY DRAWINGS AND RAFFLES
The Perfect Fit Pro Shop
www.theperfectfitproshop.com
www.usedbowlingballs.com
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: mumzie on April 02, 2004, 09:39:00 AM
Well, he can look at it as a learning experience, and move on, with a wiser outlook, or he can let this ruin his life...
This is a MINOR infraction, and something that happens all the time. PBA takes the equipment sponsorship very seriously - they have to. If he wants to play with the big boys, he needs to know the rules. I do believe rule books should have been available in the paddock as well.
Why didn't he turn around and pick up a SPONSORED wrist brace?
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: seadrive on April 02, 2004, 09:47:50 AM
You mean this thing:

"This durable, neoprene wrist aid provides total, unrestricted, flexible support. Made of quality closed-cell neoprene with absorbent, laminated stretch fabric lining. Wrap-around Velcro® straps adjust for exact tension. Helps prevent carpal tunnel syndrome and keeps wrist therapeutically warm. Includes flexible insert for additional support."

Doesn't sound like much of a wrist support.  If you ask me, your friend's problem was more mental than physical.

Tell him to get over it and move on.  If this is the worst thing that ever happens to him, he'll be pretty lucky.
--------------------
seadrive
Cogito ergo bowl
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: K_Korner on April 02, 2004, 09:52:02 AM
Thanks for the replies, but why does Master leave the PBA logo on their items?
--------------------
WIN FREE STUFF! MONTHLY DRAWINGS AND RAFFLES
The Perfect Fit Pro Shop
www.theperfectfitproshop.com
www.usedbowlingballs.com
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: PC Doc on April 02, 2004, 10:00:46 AM
Seadrive it doesn't give support in the sense of a cobra or Robby's wrist support does. I use mine because I tend to get a little sore and tenderness on the outside part of my wrist. The fact that it is a neoprene material helps keep the area warm and loose. I have fewer problems when I do wear it than when I do not. So to say that it is a mental problem is not necessarily true depending on his reasoning for wearing it. Granted that still does not take into account that the rule was in place and if I recall correctly Master has not been on the list for several years.
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: ltimpson on April 02, 2004, 10:08:29 AM
Does anyone have a link to this "list" of approved accessories?
--------------------
LT

That 10th strike continues to elude me...
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: michelle on April 02, 2004, 10:09:06 AM
I would place the blame squarely on the shoulder of the bowler for not having checked the current list of approved products that appears on the PBA website.  

There are lots of items in the marketplace that were packaged prior to the current year.  This holds true for bowling merchandise as well as other areas of sales...

Just because something was approved at one point in time does not mean it is approved for eternity...

It is ALWAYS the responsibility of the bowler to know that they are in compliance with product registration guidelines.  For PBA rules, if he truly did not have access, then he should have called Seattle if the Regional Director would not give him an answer.  My guess is that he never looked and never asked about whether his wrist device was approved for use this year.  Pay the $100 and either bowl without or obtain one that is in compliance with the current registration requirements.
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: ltimpson on April 02, 2004, 10:11:04 AM
oops, there it is...
http://www.pba.com/sponsors/default.asp?Type=1
--------------------
LT

That 10th strike continues to elude me...
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: Nicanor on April 02, 2004, 10:17:27 AM
When I bowled the US Open they make it a point to tell you that Master products are not allowed on Tour.  I used a Dragon wrist support for leagues and local tournaments but at the US Open I had to change to a Robbie Revs.  It has to be the bowlers responsiblity.
--------------------
Nicanor (Ten On The Deck)
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: cgilyeat on April 02, 2004, 10:36:49 AM
I answered this in the NE forum. but I'll echo what has been said here.  It is the bowlers responsibilty to make sure that they use registered products. As a PBA member, I'm sorry that Justin was fined and that it probably cost him money, but there is a "Registered Products" link on the PBA web page that anyone can and SHOULD access before bowling in a PBA tournment.  It's under "Membership Info", but it is accessable to everyone.

If he wasn't sure of anything, he should have asked Russ during the non-members and first-timers meeting.  Had he not taken it off, he would have been disqualified.  Was this an expensive learning experience, no doubt, but that shouldn't stop him from bowling more regionals and/or joining the PBA.  If it does, then maybe there's a bigger issue here.

Edited on 4/2/2004 11:31 AM
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: ltimpson on April 02, 2004, 10:52:43 AM
I heard there were issues with certain brands of insert tape as well, although I can't find a link to support it...
--------------------
LT

That 10th strike continues to elude me...
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: michelle on April 02, 2004, 10:54:15 AM
quote:
In his first round of match play, he was leading 1-0. He seemed to be a lock to win the match, when the tournament director approached him in the middle of the second game, in which he was also leading.  he was told that the Master Wrister that he was wearing was not a PBA sponsored item.  He was forced to take it off and fined $100 for his actions.  He could not bowl properly after that because his wrist was weakened by the removal of the Wrister and wound up losing the match.  



Looking at the recap of the event, I would hardly have said he seemed to be a lock to win the match...it wasn't as though he went from shooting lights out to scoring poorly.

From the PBA website: #6 Bob Caruso, Dayton, N.J., def. #11 Justin Warhol, Sound Beach, N.Y., 3-1 (161-195, 203-186, 237-151, 225-216)
 
His best game of the set actually came in the last of the four games...pretty much ruins the argument that he couldn't "bowl properly" after the non-approved equipment was discovered.

Being htat he was not a member and was actually bowling as a guest, he needs to suck it up as a learning experience.  If he continues to blame the manufacturer then, as others noted, there are bigger issues.

Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: cgilyeat on April 02, 2004, 12:02:02 PM
quote:
I heard there were issues with certain brands of insert tape as well, although I can't find a link to support it...
--------------------
LT

That 10th strike continues to elude me...


From the PBA Members Guide:
quote:

23.2 GUIDELINES FOR REGISTERED PRODUCTS
a. Competitors may not use any non-registered bowling-related
product in PBA competition. [Minor Penalty, One Hundred Dollar
($100) Fine, Disqualification if the product in question is not
immediately removed]
NOTE: Accessory items (cork inserts, tape, grips, slugs, rosin bags,
ball polish) are excluded from this rule.



Just found it in the on-ine version.  Of course, as pbafire stated, polish bottles must be left in the paddock.

Edited on 4/2/2004 12:57 PM
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: bass on April 02, 2004, 12:51:57 PM
In the paddock area is a list of approved products to go along with an updated book of approved bowling balls. The problems that sometimes occur are usually in the beginning of the calendar year when the users fee paid to the PBA hasn't been done yet or a company decides not to pay the fee at all. Then the bowlers start scrambling to find equipment to use. For instance before Hammer was bought by Ebonite I used a urethane Claw as a spare ball for over a year then all of a sudden this wasn't an option. Some bowling shoes weren't approved either(I believe they were called Strike(sp.?) this caused some problems for some people.
I'm kind of surprised that your friend made it all of the way to match play before somebody caught what he was wearing usually the guys would point this out long before that time.
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: LuckyLefty on April 02, 2004, 01:05:05 PM
What a bunch of CRAP!

Sounds a lot like the time Craig Stadler used a towel on wet grass to keep from getting his pants dirty.  Kneeled down hit a great shot off his knee/towels and ended up getting disqualified.

I'm sure if this guy did not make it to the match play it would never have been mentioned.

REgards,

Luckylefty
PS too bad these rules have nothing to do with whether they give a bowler an unfair advantage(cleary they don't, he just didn't have time to adjust to another brand).  All they have to do with is products paying PBA fees!
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: Shonk on April 02, 2004, 01:47:04 PM
My PBA #022227 - and I have a question concerning PBA Approved Equipment. Justin Warhol was recently fined in a NW regional, and forced to remove the unapproved item, when it was noticed that he was wearing a "Master" wrist support. Although "Master" is not on the PBA approved equipment list, neither are Mongoose and Robby's. By looking at the approved equipment listing (on the PBA website), there are no companies approved who produce wrist supports with the exception of Storm. Under rule #23, do wrist supports fall under the definition of "equipment"? Please explain why or why not.

Merriam Websters states that "equipment" is:

1 a : the set of articles or physical resources serving to equip a person or thing: as (1) : the implements used in an operation or activity : APPARATUS (2) : all the fixed assets other than land and buildings of a business enterprise (3) : the rolling stock of a railway b : a piece of such equipment
2 a : the equipping of a person or thing b : the state of being equipped
3 : mental or emotional traits or resources : ENDOWMENT

My concern is that there are only a handful of companies that produce wrist supports that actually function properly, why has the PBA chosen to not support Robby's, Mongoose, and Master as PBA approved equipment?

Doug Shonkwiler
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co.
System Design Engineer Sr.
(817)777-3609
22/3/D8
douglas.d.shonkwiler@lmco.com


--------------------
Shonk
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: Shonk on April 02, 2004, 01:48:08 PM
The above e-mail was sent to the PBA Legal Department for review.
--------------------
Shonk
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: channel surfer on April 02, 2004, 02:18:21 PM
My dad was wearing a wrister on his first pba regional, they told him to take it off. I guess it didnt bother him to much.

The wrister DOES work. I used one myself for about 2 years when I had wrist pains, bad ones. My dad bought me the wrister and it cured it while i was bowling. I no longer use it now because those pains went away after adjustments.
--------------------
My Bowling Clinic Site: http://csbowling.vze.com

ASK A PRO:http://csbowling.vze.com/atp.shtml

www.bowlersdream.com - save an additional $3 off any $100 order by simply typing in CSB into the coupon code area at checkout.
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: michelle on April 02, 2004, 02:23:00 PM
quote:

My concern is that there are only a handful of companies that produce wrist supports that actually function properly, why has the PBA chosen to not support Robby's, Mongoose, and Master as PBA approved equipment?



Easy answer there...it isn't up to the PBA to support them, it is up to the manufacturer to pay whatever fee the PBA charges.  Unless things have changed, you become a manufacturer of an approved product when you write a rather large check to the boys and girls in Seattle.  

Same principle held true in the PWBA, but the checks were not quite as large from my understanding of the registration requirements.  

WRT Robby's, I thought they fell under the Ebonite umbrella, but looking at the list I may have my companies mixed up...perhaps not enough guys using braces to justify the registration?

Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: Platinum Bowler on April 02, 2004, 04:26:09 PM
Now I may be wrong, but doesnt PDW wear a golf glove when he bowls? Im pretty sure a glove is considered equipment, if a wrist supporter is. And I really doubt the PBA is sponsored by a golf company. And I understand somewhat letting some companys stuff to be used by the bowlers and not others due to sponsorship, but yet I think its also kind of bogus.
--------------------
B-Car
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: K_Korner on April 02, 2004, 11:58:08 PM
Wow, I guess I stirred up a good topic.  thanks for all of the insight.  Having never bowled in a regional event, if I do, I know what to do now.  Correct, Justin may have gotten what he deserved, but if you are right about PDW wearing a golf glove, is it because of his Name?  Is that why you let him wear it?  Do you bend the rules for the better bowlers?  Also, why couldn't they just make him take it off?  He bowled the whole qualifying round with it.  After losing the first game and being down 20 in the 6th frame of the 2nd game, the opponent saw the wrist device and complained.  That is the reason Justin got fined and was forced to remove it.
--------------------
WIN FREE STUFF! MONTHLY DRAWINGS AND RAFFLES
The Perfect Fit Pro Shop
www.theperfectfitproshop.com
www.usedbowlingballs.com
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: UCFKnight300 on April 03, 2004, 12:35:32 AM
I don't think it has anything to do with bending the rules for Weber.  I am pretty sure his glove has no logos and therefore does not advertise another product.  That is the main concern for the PBA, they don't want to advertise someones product and not be compensated for it.  A friend of mine bowled a regional a couple weeks ago and he was not allowed to use his Minnie Mouse spare ball.  Yes it sounds funny and he got the ball as a joke, but they said it promotes disney products and isn't allowed, even though it is made by brunswick, go figure.  So it's their tour if you want to bowl in it you must comply.  

Mike
-UCF-
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: LuckyLefty on April 03, 2004, 12:51:47 AM
Would Tape over the MasterLogo have worked!

Again what does any of this have regarding giving an unfair advantage to an opponent.  Answer = nothing!  That is why pure crap.

REgards,

Luckylefty
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: seadrive on April 03, 2004, 09:26:19 AM
quote:
Again what does any of this have regarding giving an unfair advantage to an opponent.  Answer = nothing!  That is why pure crap.

LL, it has nothing to do with giving someone an advantage.  It's about sponsors and money, nothing more, nothing less.

Personally, although I understand the rule, I think it should only apply to televised events.  Who really gives a rat's hind quarters if someone uses a non-sponsored product in a regional viewed by, what, 50 people?  Who cares?

But, the rule is the rule, and this guy should have made himself aware of the rules before competing.  Shake it off, forget it, let it go.
--------------------
seadrive
Cogito ergo bowl
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: bass on April 03, 2004, 10:25:03 AM
Putting tape over the logo might have worked.
A few years ago you had to trim the tags of your pants(i.e. dockers) or blaken them out.
It was basically a running joke during roll call to look for offenders and have their pants "altered" before competition.
It's probably best to ask a tournament official about a product before using it in competition.
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: LuckyLefty on April 03, 2004, 10:54:38 AM
I understand that Sea!  That's why it's crap.

I can enter tournaments all the time where there is more money than regionals without having to put up with that crap!  I wouldn't even waste my time unless it was the only thing in the world I could do for money!  That's why there are so many great bowlers making a living just off brackets, pot games and tournaments in Vegas.

Now a sport that has some money like golf, well that's a different story.
If they told me I had to wear a Hairpiece with a logo Jimmy's Sushi Palace for that type of money I'd do it!

For $1,000 or $2,000 dollars at the first sign of BS like that I'm outta there!

REgards,

Luckylefty
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: seadrive on April 03, 2004, 01:47:39 PM
Okay LL, we're on the same page.

As I said, I think this sponsor stuff should only apply to televised tour stops.  At the regional and senior (not televised for past two years) levels, you're right, it's a bunch of crap.

Also, the guy who complained about the Wrister in the 2nd game of the match, after losing the first game, comes off as a sore loser and a crybaby.  I can't imagine pulling that kind of crap in the middle of a match.
--------------------
seadrive
Cogito ergo bowl
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: LuckyLefty on April 04, 2004, 12:58:46 AM
Oh, I can definitely see people pulling that in a match.

One of the greatest eye openers of my life came when I was in my early 20s.
I'd grown up at a local golf course playing with my Dad and always had been treated great by people, I was only a so so player.

After a few years in College I came back a much stronger player and became a member of this club that had 30,000 members(work oriented).  In my first two weeks there I won the club championship, smokin some other well known players by quite a bit.

It was very exciting for me and many seemed very gracious.  I was invited to play in the scratch league by the league secretary in the upcoming fall.
As I step up to the tee, this little guy the league secretary who had been runnerup in the tournament I won a couple times of about 25 years of trying.  Cleared his throat as loud as he could during my backswing of my first shot in league.

I thought it was an accident.  As the year went on this guy pulled similar crap repeatedly.  He was the father of an acquaintance of mine from elementary school and a somewhat respected member of the work community.  His position in the work community kept him from becoming rapidly horizontal.

I lost all respect for him and was quite happy to play with him as he contended for the title a couple of years later and in the final round while I didn't win I was able to watch him virtually self destruct while I roared near the top the final day.  Him coughing and hacking many a time during mine and other players shots.  It cleared up after the round.  This man was a small, little mean unhappy person jealous of the success of others.  Others that have this trait become smaller become smaller and pettier every day.

At that time I realized that many people will resent success and while others will truly share ones joy with them.  It is quite the measure of a man where he fits in this spectrum!

Over the years I have gained some wonderful perspective on people and this is a defining trait of people that I enjoy.  The ability to enjoy the success of others.

REgards,

Luckylefty
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: Shonk on April 05, 2004, 09:03:24 AM
Here is the e-mail I received from Kirk Von Kruegor, the PBA Tour Tournament Director:

Dear Mr. Shonkwiler,
 
Thank you for your recent inquiry.  Yes, it is correct that Mongoose and Master are among those companies whose equipment is not cleared for use in PBA competition.  However, Robby's (an Ebonite product), Columbia, Storm, Ebonite (main line) and Hi Sports (under the Storm umbrella) all make excellent products and offer wide variety of wrist supports and gloves.
 
The companies listed above have chosen to support the PBA by participating in the Product Registration Program.  We in turn support those companies who have a vested interest in registering their products for use in PBA competition.  To allow other, non-product registered equipment in PBA competition would not be in the best interest of those product registered companies who have stepped up to support the PBA.
 
I hope this satisfactorily answers all of your questions concerning the product registration policy.  If you have further questions feel free to contact me directly at kirk.von.krueger@pba.com
 
Sincerely
 
Kirk von Krueger
Director, PBA Tour

--------------------
Shonk
Title: Re: The Downfall of a possible New Member to the PBA
Post by: Leftyhi-trak on April 06, 2004, 01:41:24 PM
It just all depends on who you are or aren't. I still know Norm Duke used Asics bowling shoes and never had found them on the approved list. Why if your a non-member should you have to comply with any more than ball restrictions. If its a member understood, but the weekend warrior in it for one or two tourneys a year its a bit bogus and if it was his competitor who turned it into the director during the match I say he is a puss. Shoe up and let who's best settle the score. I believe in mental aspects but that is in poor standing in my estimation. I know it might mean you lose money but it has more to do for me than just the cash.