win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Tim Mack  (Read 3573 times)

Danes07

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1418
Tim Mack
« on: February 21, 2008, 06:57:32 AM »
Check out PBA.com....Tim Mack has made the Round of 32.  He'll be bowling Brian LeClair.

Nice to see him out there....be pretty amazing if he made the show, on a major nonetheless.
--------------------
University at Albany 2007
    -Let's Go Danes-

ROTO GRIP - King of Them All

 

themachine300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1410
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2008, 03:29:13 PM »
I like Tim Mack, its a shame all the injuries he's had, but bowling great this week.  Hope things continue to go well for him in the future.  How sweet would it be to see multiple non-exempt players make the show?
--------------------
www.bowlingsolutions.com

Move left, hook it more.....

Tommy Jones is a Gamecock fan...are you???

We shall now refer a 4-bagger as a hambone...Mark it down the revolution has started!
Philipp Hudak
Ebonite Amateur Staff
Bowl To Win!
#TeamEBI

mrbowlingnut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5727
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2008, 03:36:34 PM »
I would love too see a non-exempt field for once, it would be interesting to see how fast these guys would buy a PBA card to become exempt if that would be allowed.

strikestriketapped

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3372
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2008, 04:29:32 PM »
140 by Mack.
--------------------
www.stormbowling.com

Borincano

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1181
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2008, 05:03:50 PM »
Tim Mack does not have a chance tonight. Up to this time in three games he has thrown only four strikes. Very rare.

Edited on 2/21/2008 6:05 PM

DON DRAPER

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5576
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #5 on: February 21, 2008, 07:15:46 PM »
tim mack swept 4-0 by brian leclair. i still maintain tim mack is a good player but perhaps not as good as everyone says he is. he falls into the same category as robert smith, rudy kasimakis, patrick healey, jr., and brian kretzer. all of these were great amateur  and/or megabucks players but other than smith and healey, jr., have had no success on the pba tour.

JessN16

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3716
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #6 on: February 21, 2008, 07:18:25 PM »
I would have liked to have gotten a live look at Mack, but I also like LeClair, the eternal underdog. Seems like a nice guy and I'd like for him to get a title before his career is done.

Jess

Stever5000

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 613
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #7 on: February 21, 2008, 07:25:53 PM »
His daughter has been flirting with me lately.  Everytime she and Brenda walk by, she waves at me.

I think it's pretty cute.

DON DRAPER

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5576
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #8 on: February 21, 2008, 07:46:35 PM »
brian leclair has had a "journeyman" type pba career. has bowled for a title twice losing both times to walter ray williams, jr. to beat a player of macks caliber is a great feather in his cap. i'm sure there were many who gave leclair little chance in beating mack.

northface28

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3333
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #9 on: February 21, 2008, 11:29:03 PM »
quote:
tim mack swept 4-0 by brian leclair. i still maintain tim mack is a good player but perhaps not as good as everyone says he is. he falls into the same category as robert smith, rudy kasimakis, patrick healey, jr., and brian kretzer. all of these were great amateur  and/or megabucks players but other than smith and healey, jr., have had no success on the pba tour.


How has Robert Smith not had success on tour? Do you own a television?
--------------------
Mea Culpa
NLMB 150 Dream Team
#NoTalking
#HellaBandz

Spider Ball Bowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4101
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #10 on: February 21, 2008, 11:36:38 PM »
If you read it completely, it actually says "OTHER than Smith and Healey...."
--------------------
Formerly SGC300
"Never get into a pissing match with a skunk, cuz he'll piss all over you and like it."-Keyshawn Johnson on Terrell Owens

DON DRAPER

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5576
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #11 on: February 22, 2008, 10:41:16 AM »
northface28, i do own a television------a 42" panasonic widescreen plasma unit. when you combine this with directv hd you get an unbeatable picture. i never said robert smith wasn't a good player. but, there were many who said with his power game he would take the pba tour by storm. that didn't happen did it ? he lives and dies by the power ball. he isn't nearly as versatile as really needs to be to be a dominant player on the pba tour.

DON DRAPER

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5576
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #12 on: February 22, 2008, 10:50:35 AM »
if you go back to when robert smith was younger and injury free his power game still did not make him a dominant player on the pba tour. he would have great weeks when his ball speed and power would excel on patterns with friction to the right. but on tougher lane conditions or where he couldn't play his "a" game he would finish in the middle of the pack.

DON DRAPER

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5576
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #13 on: February 22, 2008, 08:35:17 PM »
nice attempt at humor but his playing ability and his results never came close to what many thought they would.

abrown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1030
Re: Tim Mack
« Reply #14 on: February 22, 2008, 08:49:56 PM »
who ever said that tim mack isn't as good as everyone says look at his entire profile he was the big man in the international sean before he went to the pba. umm isn't he still the captain on the weber cup team and usually out bowls the exempt bowlers. the fact is has over 66 titles all over the world and a 3 time bowler of the world. so i wouldn't say he ain't no good just cause he had some injuries