win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Exerpt from Bowling this Months Review of the CASH  (Read 8397 times)

newguy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1079
Exerpt from Bowling this Months Review of the CASH
« on: January 25, 2017, 10:55:26 AM »
Radical Cash Bowling Ball Review
REVIEWED BY: THE BTM BALL TESTING TEAM

This mammoth of a bowling ball was best for us on our heavy oil test pattern. On their first shots with the Cash, all three testers attempted to play the same line they played with the Fix and Guru Master. With that alignment, they all three barely hit the headpin going left with this ball. After getting adjusted to the pocket, they were all the farthest left they have ever started on this pattern. The Cash made our 44 foot pattern look much shorter. All three of our testers needed to make sure they were aggressive with their ball speeds in order to get the Cash far enough down the lane before it hooked. As much traction as this ball created, it was even more impressive that the Cash didn’t burn up and quit before it got to the pocket. This ball hooked significantly more than anything we have seen so far.
Strengths
The Cash has the ability to absolutely obliterate an oil pattern. Bowlers who want to overpower the oil pattern will be able to do so with this hook monster.
Overall Summary
Cash is king in the total hook department. The Cash will create more traction and hook than any ball on the market today.

 

tburky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1071
Re: Exerpt from Bowling this Months Review of the CASH
« Reply #16 on: January 25, 2017, 10:23:18 PM »
my 2 best balls where I bowl is an iq tour 30 and daredevil.  As short as the pattern is and low volume the cash was would probably roll out quick. With that said i hope they sell the hell out of the cash..

spencerwatts

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
Re: Exerpt from Bowling this Months Review of the CASH
« Reply #17 on: January 26, 2017, 04:47:44 PM »
I saw where Vernon Peterson, a contributor to one of the prominent bowling publications, had a deep run on the Bradley earlier this month using The Cash. The Cash looked like a sponge on that high volume 46-47 foot pattern.

Then again, Peterson had a similar deep run in the Bradley a couple of years ago using the original Guru.
Ball speed avg. (18.25 mph)
Rev rate avg. (400-428 rpm)
Still refusing to accept AARP eligibility and membership cards

LookingForALeftyWall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
Re: Exerpt from Bowling this Months Review of the CASH
« Reply #18 on: January 27, 2017, 08:42:03 AM »
Even Storm made a killing by simply changing the name and color of equipment with no real change in technology.

Lights Out/Punch Out - Fast/Furious - 2Fast/2Furious
Victory Road - T-Road - HyRoad - Crossroad


Lights Out/Punch Out had a different core than the Fast/Furious and 2Fast/2Furious - you must of meant the Fringe/Manic duo...that's the duo with the NOS Core...but yeah, your point stands.

LookingForALeftyWall

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 658
Re: Exerpt from Bowling this Months Review of the CASH
« Reply #19 on: January 27, 2017, 08:50:35 AM »
I will say that the Cash intrigues me for sport shots.  I tend to ball up when my lefty wall is taken away...

spmcgivern

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2079
Re: Exerpt from Bowling this Months Review of the CASH
« Reply #20 on: January 27, 2017, 12:03:45 PM »
Even Storm made a killing by simply changing the name and color of equipment with no real change in technology.

Lights Out/Punch Out - Fast/Furious - 2Fast/2Furious
Victory Road - T-Road - HyRoad - Crossroad


Lights Out/Punch Out had a different core than the Fast/Furious and 2Fast/2Furious - you must of meant the Fringe/Manic duo...that's the duo with the NOS Core...but yeah, your point stands.

Not that it is pertinent, but the Lights Out/Punch Out had the Tubine Core along with the Fast/Furious/2Fast/2Furious. The Manic/Fringe/Frantic/Freak'n Frantic all had the N.O.S. core.

I will say at least the Lights Out was hybrid, but not sure where it really fit in between a solid and a pearl.  In one way or another, all hybrids are pearls and all pearls are hybrids.  In my opinion, it is just how much "pearl" additive is added.