win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Guru vs. Reax  (Read 8971 times)

Jorge300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6407
Guru vs. Reax
« on: December 09, 2014, 10:24:15 AM »
Maybe I missed this within one of the threads, but how does the Guru compare to the original Reax? I have the Reax and thought that was a strong ball. Not sure I will find much use for the Guru if it is even stronger....but then again I saw a very good bowler throwing one in my league last night. Not sure how he did it, but he threw it all 3 games. Just curious as to how these compare. Thanks in advance for your time.
Jorge300

 

robertbrowder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 381
  • Deer Park, TX
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2014, 06:36:41 AM »
The Guru has more length then the original Reax and it creates more entry angle than the Reax. I liked my Reax on synthetics with heavy volume but the Guru has taken its place.
Motiv Regional Staff
www.motivbowling.com
Striking Results Pro Shop Staff

spencerwatts

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #2 on: December 10, 2014, 08:33:51 AM »
How much more length? Are we talking maybe a foot at the most? But that is significant depending on the pattern and angle of attack.
Ball speed avg. (18.25 mph)
Rev rate avg. (400-428 rpm)
Still refusing to accept AARP eligibility and membership cards

Jorge300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6407
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #3 on: December 10, 2014, 09:56:13 AM »
Robert,
    So is the overall hook about the same, just that the Guru is longer and stronger, creating more angle? That is what I am taking away from your response. Am I correct in my thinking? Thanks for taking the time.



The Guru has more length then the original Reax and it creates more entry angle than the Reax. I liked my Reax on synthetics with heavy volume but the Guru has taken its place.
Jorge300

robertbrowder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 381
  • Deer Park, TX
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #4 on: December 10, 2014, 11:25:23 AM »
Yes I get about a foot more length and more overall hook than my Reax. My Reax is earlier and has more arc than my Guru. The way the Guru goes through the pins is the strongest I've seen in a long time.
« Last Edit: December 10, 2014, 11:27:37 AM by robertbrowder »
Motiv Regional Staff
www.motivbowling.com
Striking Results Pro Shop Staff

spencerwatts

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #5 on: December 10, 2014, 12:54:02 PM »
I know this is a Radical board. I've seen guys using the Jackal with various surfaces (mostly between 2000 and 4000) and on various pattern lengths (from Cheetah to WTBA Paris), and that ball hits HARD.

I feel my Reax Solid hits similarly and its cover is quite adaptable. (I've used it at 500 and at 4000 so far when bowling in scratch gigs). Would the same be said about the Guru's hitting power and its cover's adaptability?
Ball speed avg. (18.25 mph)
Rev rate avg. (400-428 rpm)
Still refusing to accept AARP eligibility and membership cards

ImBackInTheGame

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1022
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #6 on: December 10, 2014, 03:06:05 PM »
I have both.  The Reax is a great control or benchmark ball.  The Guru is a completely different beast.  For being a solid sanded ball, the Guru get's surprising length and the back end motion is crazy.  I'm speed dominant and usually have to play down and in, but the Guru allows me to move in and swing the ball and still have enough to get back to the pocket.

Jorge300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6407
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #7 on: December 10, 2014, 03:45:46 PM »
And the Reax didn't?

My Reax was the biggest hooking ball I have ever thrown, and I am speed dominant also. I don't see it as a benchmark ball at all. What surface do you have it at?

I have both.  The Reax is a great control or benchmark ball.  The Guru is a completely different beast.  For being a solid sanded ball, the Guru get's surprising length and the back end motion is crazy.  I'm speed dominant and usually have to play down and in, but the Guru allows me to move in and swing the ball and still have enough to get back to the pocket.
Jorge300

MI 2 AZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8156
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2014, 05:24:45 PM »
I have a Reax and I could not consider that ball to be a benchmark type, but that is with my style and the drier lanes I bowl on.  Maybe with a lot more ball speed and more oil it could be for someone.

_________________________________________
Six decades of league bowling and still learning.

ABC/USBC Lifetime Member since Aug 1995.

ImBackInTheGame

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1022
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #9 on: December 10, 2014, 06:08:47 PM »
It's the drilling on the reax making it my benchmark.  Surface is a very worn 500 grit.  Works great for league on wood lanes.

ImBackInTheGame

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1022
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2014, 09:03:02 AM »
I also have a Brunswick Mastermind.  Mo Pinel laid out both the Mastermind and the Guru on separate visits to my area.  Mo even told me that the Reax would be my control ball, the Mastermind goes above the Reax and the Guru above the Mastermind.  That's exactly how it looks on the lanes as well.  I have a Hy-Road pearl that works nicely below the Reax.

robertbrowder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 381
  • Deer Park, TX
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #11 on: December 12, 2014, 10:26:19 AM »
Game,
When your ready replace the Hy-Road Pearl with the Reax Gusto you'll love the change.
Motiv Regional Staff
www.motivbowling.com
Striking Results Pro Shop Staff

Jorge300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6407
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #12 on: December 12, 2014, 11:44:33 AM »
Game,
      Let me start off by saying this isn't a personal swipe at you. But why would you take a ball like the Reax and drill it so weak to make it a benchmark ball? It would seem there are other balls in the Rafical line-up better suited to this. Personally, I don't see the advantage of taking a heavy oil, hooking, ball and drilling it weak. I have the Reax drilled slightly strong and use it as it wad intended, on longer/heavier patterns. As I said, I am more on the speed dominant side as well. I know Mo gave you these drillings, and he has more knowledge in his pinky then probably ever will.....but I still don't get it.
Jorge300

ImBackInTheGame

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1022
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #13 on: December 12, 2014, 01:21:39 PM »
Not sure if my Reax is really drilled "weak".  25 x 4-1/4 x 40 with a P3 hole

When I got it, the intent was for use on long sport patterns.  I'm not sure what happened, but it turned out to just be okay on long sport patterns but was great for league.

I'm not an expert on layouts and such, but I do like the ball just not quite exactly what I hoped for.

spencerwatts

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 383
Re: Guru vs. Reax
« Reply #14 on: December 12, 2014, 02:01:53 PM »
What kind of surface did you have on the Reax Solid? Usually 1000 works when you're talking about 'heavy oil'. But depending on your game (i.e., ball speed and/or rev rate), 500 or 360 works on heavy oil/long patterns.
Ball speed avg. (18.25 mph)
Rev rate avg. (400-428 rpm)
Still refusing to accept AARP eligibility and membership cards