win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Rogue Cell vs Hyroad  (Read 1047 times)

solid 10

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 17
Rogue Cell vs Hyroad
« on: February 20, 2010, 03:32:59 AM »
Anybody had any experience throwing both of these with similar drillings and what difference did you see in length, mid lane, and back end reaction?  Thanks

 

Locke

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1482
Re: Rogue Cell vs Hyroad
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2010, 01:14:39 PM »
I have not owned a Hy-Road but I have thrown one with a similar drilling as my Rogue and I bowl with a guy who has both. These two balls are nothing alike. The Rogue is stronger than the original Cell and will give you a strong backend but still very archy. The Hy-road is going to be less hook and much longer. It will give you a much snappier look as well. The fact is, the Rogue had the strongest cover ever made by Roto Grip when it came out. The Mutant now has that but the Mutant is just the solid version of the Rogue cover. So even though the Rogue Cell is a hybrid it is nothing like the Hy-Road.
--------------------
They call me the thread killer...

Always be sincere, even when you don't mean it

The Cell Pimp
Always be sincere, even when you don't mean it.

solid 10

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 17
Re: Rogue Cell vs Hyroad
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2010, 01:39:30 PM »
Thanks, Pimp!  Good recap and that's the kind of info I was looking for.  Sounds like the Rogue would be a better choice for oil.  So what about the Mutant?  Is it much earlier than the Rogue and if so it must be more archy on the back.  Does that sound about right?