win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Cell Pearl vs 2nd Dimension  (Read 1364 times)

Hoselrockets

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1230
Cell Pearl vs 2nd Dimension
« on: April 11, 2009, 03:22:32 PM »
for you storm and roto fans can you please compare these two ball for me?  They are somewhat close in specs but I'm looking for real life experience.  I use a ton of 900 equipment but I kind of feel there mid stuff just isn't equal to there higher end balls.

I'm thinking about doing a Cell Pearl and 2nd Dimension for the USBC's?

any suggests or thoughts would be greatly appreciated, thanks.
--------------------
THB
Logged

 

CHawk15

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 764
Re: Cell Pearl vs 2nd Dimension
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2009, 02:59:54 AM »
I don't know about the Cell Pearl, but I used a 2nd Dimension with some surface very effectively at nationals.
Logged

Hoselrockets

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1230
Re: Cell Pearl vs 2nd Dimension
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2009, 07:27:38 AM »
any more info?  how is it drilled, where did you play?  team or d/s??
--------------------
THB
Logged

Dan Belcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: Cell Pearl vs 2nd Dimension
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2009, 08:19:59 PM »
The Cell Pearl is more angular than the Second Dimension.  Also, the Second Dimension can handle a little more oil.  I threw my Second Dimension on the USBC Open pattern at a different house in practice (there's a little more friction and the shot played easier than how it actually plays in Vegas from what I've heard, I don't bowl there for another couple of months!) and had a great look.  Here's a video of it.
Logged

jwhaleyii

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 60
Re: Cell Pearl vs 2nd Dimension
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2009, 02:01:32 AM »
For me Second Dimension was more angular but still contollable and hit a little harder to on nationals pattern. Both 2d and cell pearl are drilled the same 4in 50x30 . Cell Pearl didn't cover as many boards and just wasn't as aggressive as 2d. My choice is 2d hands down. I thought i loved my cell pearl till i got my 2d.
--------------------
Storm Hyroad 1 2000 abralon(benchmark ball)
Storm Hyroad 2 4000 polished
Storm Second Dimension
Storm T-road Pearl
Logged

JD74

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 695
Re: Cell Pearl vs 2nd Dimension
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2009, 09:11:49 AM »
I have both of these balls and there drilled the same way (skid/flip), I have high revs high speed (580 rpms, 2 handed, 19-21mph). The Cell Pearl clears the heads really easy and goes longer than the 2nd but has a more flippy backend for me. The 2nd has a good midlane read, and has more of a strong arc backend, once it starts up it isn't going to stop till it hits the back of the pin deck. Both of the balls are at OOB.
--------------------
Lefty
480 rpms
300(5)
800(1)
Average 220+

http://ebonite.com/
BOWL TO WIN!
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »