win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Epic v. Rs-x  (Read 1439 times)

tedfields

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 40
Epic v. Rs-x
« on: June 22, 2005, 06:00:49 AM »
Roger, given identical surface prep, identical pin position,
similar top weight, which of these two are the better "oiler"?

 

Jeffrevs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11890
Re: Epic v. Rs-x
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2005, 02:48:02 PM »
ted, your best bet is to email Roger at rogerN@rotogrip.com ....

my first guess is that either are "oilers" since both are solid reactives....it looks as though they have similar if not the same cover w/ different cores....I'm interested too,....but my first guess would be that either are "oilers" ....prepped and drilled right they'll be able to do some fairly heavy stuff, but I believe both they're design intent is for medium heavy oil.
--------------------
JEFF
"Chance to squint at a sky so blue that it hurts your eyes just to look at it."

tedfields

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 40
Re: Epic v. Rs-x
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2005, 02:51:10 PM »
Thanks, Jeff

rotomike

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 485
Re: Epic v. Rs-x
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2005, 03:04:21 PM »
Hello,

I believe the Epic wil be the better oiler.  The weight block design and coverstock both will be a bit earlier.

Mike
Mike Sinek
Roto Grip / Storm Staff Manager
Kingdom member for life

Jeffrevs

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11890
Re: Epic v. Rs-x
« Reply #4 on: June 23, 2005, 07:18:23 AM »
quote:
Hello,

I believe the Epic wil be the better oiler.  The weight block design and coverstock both will be a bit earlier.

Mike


earlier than the RSX ?! WOW
--------------------
JEFF
"Chance to squint at a sky so blue that it hurts your eyes just to look at it."