BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Roto Grip => Topic started by: tedfields on June 22, 2005, 06:00:49 AM

Title: Epic v. Rs-x
Post by: tedfields on June 22, 2005, 06:00:49 AM

Roger, given identical surface prep, identical pin position,
similar top weight, which of these two are the better "oiler"?

Title: Re: Epic v. Rs-x
Post by: Jeffrevs on June 22, 2005, 02:48:02 PM

ted, your best bet is to email Roger at rogerN@rotogrip.com ....

my first guess is that either are "oilers" since both are solid reactives....it looks as though they have similar if not the same cover w/ different cores....I'm interested too,....but my first guess would be that either are "oilers" ....prepped and drilled right they'll be able to do some fairly heavy stuff, but I believe both they're design intent is for medium heavy oil.
--------------------
JEFF
"Chance to squint at a sky so blue that it hurts your eyes just to look at it."

Title: Re: Epic v. Rs-x
Post by: tedfields on June 22, 2005, 02:51:10 PM

Thanks, Jeff

Title: Re: Epic v. Rs-x
Post by: rotomike on June 22, 2005, 03:04:21 PM

Hello,

I believe the Epic wil be the better oiler.  The weight block design and coverstock both will be a bit earlier.

Mike

Title: Re: Epic v. Rs-x
Post by: Jeffrevs on June 23, 2005, 07:18:23 AM

quote:

---

Hello,

I believe the Epic wil be the better oiler.  The weight block design and coverstock both will be a bit earlier.

Mike

---

earlier than the RSX ?! WOW
--------------------
JEFF
"Chance to squint at a sky so blue that it hurts your eyes just to look at it."