Home
Ball List
Ball Reviews
Forum
User List
Help
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email
?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
BallReviews Forum
»
Equipment Boards
»
Roto Grip
»
Fuel line comparison
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
Author
Topic: Fuel line comparison (Read 1498 times)
PJM300
Hero Member
Posts: 607
Fuel line comparison
«
on:
September 27, 2003, 04:27:56 AM »
Just looking for your opinions. If I were to drill all 3 of the Fuel series up exactly the same how different do you think each would look, perform on the lane on the same oil pattern. Typical house shot.
Logged
Jeffrevs
Hero Member
Posts: 11890
Re: Fuel line comparison
«
Reply #1 on:
September 29, 2003, 11:56:03 AM »
PJM,
Rags basically has it.........heavier, medium heavy, medium....
My Fuel can do both medium heavy and heavy, ....I only have the Fuel and Pure Fuel. For me, personally, the Top and Fuel would overalap too much....but that's me..........
But drilled the same, box condition in your scenario....
Fuel would be earliest w/ a medium strong backing
Top Fuel would be a little longer w/ a little stronger backend
Pure Fuel would be even longer w/ a little more backend than the Top...
--------------------
JEFF
Member: Sub
500
Club..wanna join?
Logged
Print
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
BallReviews Forum
»
Equipment Boards
»
Roto Grip
»
Fuel line comparison