win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Hectic ball review  (Read 4012 times)

mikelj1952

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 9
Hectic ball review
« on: January 18, 2016, 09:22:37 AM »
I tested my Hectic on my 39-foot house shot. The 1500-polished pearl finish worked well for this condition. I pushed the ball to the dry area to gain some friction.

My Hectic is drilled with the pin up above the fingers and a dual thumb hole layout. (45 X 4 X 35) I wanted to have a ball that would compliment my Critical and have a nice skid flip reaction.

This ball which utilizes the Devour core, produced about 3-5 inches of flare. The ball skidded nicely through the heads as I played just inside the oil line skidding out to the dryer boards. Once the ball encountered some friction, it revved up nicely and made a pronounced move to the pocket. As with all Roto Grip balls, it drove through the pin deck.

The Hectic has a very predictable reaction, and with the 2.56 RG and .034 differential makes it a great addition for the lower rev medium speed league player who needs the extra length from the polished cover when the lanes begin to breakdown.

What I enjoyed the most about this ball is the late breaking skid flip reaction. It produced a nice dramatic hook to the pocket and devastated the pins. What a fun ball to throw.

The Hectic is a nice go to ball for the league bowler and is good compliment to the Critical and Eternal Cell. This ball will make a nice addition to anyone’s arsenal.

Mike Johnston
Roto Grip Staff

 

yellowdog07

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 41
Hectic ball review
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2016, 03:40:20 PM »

Weight:  14 lbs.
Pin Length:  4”
Drilling:  40 X 3-3/8 X 35
Pattern Length:  39 ft.
Pattern Volume:  Light/Medium
Pattern Type:  House Pattern
Right Handed

The HECTIC is the latest addition to Roto Grip’s HP2 line.  The Hectic is equipped with the Late Roll 56 Core, pearl reactive coverstock, 4” flare potential, and comes out of the box at 1500-grit polished.

I used the HECTIC on our 39 ft. house pattern, at box finish (1500 grit polished).

I found the HECTIC to be extremely clean through the heads, with a very strong flip coming off the pattern.  The HECTIC is stronger than I anticipated.   I was able to start with the HECTIC, playing between 5 and 10 boards and got a very good back end reaction.  I got the length that I needed, with great pin carry.  The corners weren’t an issue, even as the set progressed and I had to migrate in a bit.
This is a great piece for Light/Medium oil patterns. It is a great mid priced ball for bowlers of all skill levels.   If you love the Devour, you won’t be disappointed in the HECTIC, as it has the same core, with a  pearl reactive coverstock for more length and stronger flip.


Carol T
Roto Grip Amateur Staff Member

Scottlio

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Hectic ball review
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2016, 03:15:20 AM »
Hi I'm new here and relatively new to bowling but have been progressing rather quickly using only house balls. I've done a ton of research to become better acquainted with the sport and and its more specific elements. I'm currently deciding between the devour and the hectic as my first ball. I know all the differences/similarities between the two but my question is this. Considering the identical cores yet differing coverstocks, if I were to go with the solid reactive of the devour and find that it's eating up too much oil on house/league lanes, could I essentially just have it polished accordingmy to alleviate the issue, and also vice versa with the pearl reactive hectic by sanding it down should I find that I'm pushing thru the oil too much and not getting enough back end? In doing either of these, would it produce an almost identical ball reaction to its counterpart? In other words would the devour act very similarly to the hectic with some moderate polish while maintaining the solid coverstock and the hectic to the devour with sanding to the pearl reactive? Any insight is much appreciated. I would just like to be sure before purchasing that if I go with Either and don't get the reaction I want That I can alter its coverstock to my liking. Thank you

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Hectic ball review
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2016, 09:21:15 AM »
Hi I'm new here and relatively new to bowling but have been progressing rather quickly using only house balls. I've done a ton of research to become better acquainted with the sport and and its more specific elements. I'm currently deciding between the devour and the hectic as my first ball. I know all the differences/similarities between the two but my question is this. Considering the identical cores yet differing coverstocks, if I were to go with the solid reactive of the devour and find that it's eating up too much oil on house/league lanes, could I essentially just have it polished accordingmy to alleviate the issue, and also vice versa with the pearl reactive hectic by sanding it down should I find that I'm pushing thru the oil too much and not getting enough back end? In doing either of these, would it produce an almost identical ball reaction to its counterpart? In other words would the devour act very similarly to the hectic with some moderate polish while maintaining the solid coverstock and the hectic to the devour with sanding to the pearl reactive? Any insight is much appreciated. I would just like to be sure before purchasing that if I go with Either and don't get the reaction I want That I can alter its coverstock to my liking. Thank you

For some (maybe 10 - 25%) people, they will see a difference between a polished Devour and a stock Hectic, and vice versa.

About 90%of bowlers could do what you would to do:
Use the ball as it is out-of-the-box and when the lanes change enough to warrant it, sand or polish the ball as needed to adapt to the new condition.

The problem becomes when the house has problems with the oil machine or with the people using it and the condition becomes inconsistent week to week. One cannot change the surface every other week. Besides, if one week they're oily and you use the sanded one, then the following week, they don't oil so well and you need a polished one, you don't have that and your game suffers that week.  If you polish it for the next week's league, what if they oil the lanes correctly and again you need the sanded/dull ball??

Many league bowlers will carry 2 balls, one dull and one polished.

"None are so blind as those who will not see."

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Hectic ball review
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2016, 09:28:21 AM »
I tested my Hectic on my 39-foot house shot. The 1500-polished pearl finish worked well for this condition. I pushed the ball to the dry area to gain some friction.

My Hectic is drilled with the pin up above the fingers and a dual thumb hole layout. (45 X 4 X 35) I wanted to have a ball that would compliment my Critical and have a nice skid flip reaction.

This ball which utilizes the Devour core, produced about 3-5 inches of flare. The ball skidded nicely through the heads as I played just inside the oil line skidding out to the dryer boards. Once the ball encountered some friction, it revved up nicely and made a pronounced move to the pocket. As with all Roto Grip balls, it drove through the pin deck.

The Hectic has a very predictable reaction, and with the 2.56 RG and .034 differential makes it a great addition for the lower rev medium speed league player who needs the extra length from the polished cover when the lanes begin to breakdown.

What I enjoyed the most about this ball is the late breaking skid flip reaction. It produced a nice dramatic hook to the pocket and devastated the pins. What a fun ball to throw.

The Hectic is a nice go to ball for the league bowler and is good compliment to the Critical and Eternal Cell. This ball will make a nice addition to anyone’s arsenal.

Mike Johnston
Roto Grip Staff


The problem is you could use this "review" to describe 15 - 30 different balls from almost every manufacturer these days.  You're basically just saying the Hectic is a polished, medium-strength pearl.

You should really compare it to other polished pearls with the same drilling or explain how it is usable on different oil patterns and with different drillings and on different lane surfaces. How it is the right step up and the right step down from the rest of your arsenal. You didn't describe where you played each ball and how they differed when you mentioned the Critical and the Eternal Cell in passing.
"None are so blind as those who will not see."