win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Horizon Solid = Atomic Charge?  (Read 1603 times)

tjj300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 855
Horizon Solid = Atomic Charge?
« on: March 22, 2007, 01:16:56 PM »
Anybody throw both these balls?  How do they compare? Specs and Coverstock they look very close.



Logged

 

kmanestor22

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 969
Re: Horizon Solid = Atomic Charge?
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2007, 01:43:58 PM »
If it is, I have an order to place!
--------------------
Where is the bait?  I'm goin' to jail!!! - Chocolate GAYzer
Logged

J_Mac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6778
Re: Horizon Solid = Atomic Charge?
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2007, 01:09:23 AM »
Similar specs don't translate to similar ball motion...
--------------------
"A word to the wise ain't necessary -- it's the stupid ones that need the advice."  Bill Cosby
"Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their level and beat you with experience."
Logged

DP3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6093
Re: Horizon Solid = Atomic Charge?
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2007, 02:49:39 AM »
^^Especially when two completely different coverstocks are in question.  The Horizon Solid uses one of the strongest resin bases on the market now.  It's way stronger and more durable than the Monsoon cover on the Atomic Charge.  If there was a Storm ball that is close to the Horizon Solid it'd probaly be the Dark Thunder, and even then the Horizon Solid is still a touch more.
--------------------
-DJ Marshall
...The Twelve In a Row Pro Shop
Logged

tjj300

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 855
Re: Horizon Solid = Atomic Charge?
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2007, 03:35:00 PM »
I thought the Monsoon coverstock was one of the stronger ones that Storm has. And since Storm makes/made both balls I assumed a strong Storm coverstock and a strong RotoGrip coverstock had similar characteristics.


Logged

DP3

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6093
Re: Horizon Solid = Atomic Charge?
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2007, 06:31:25 PM »
Nope.  They aren't close.  Monsoon was strong, but it had a high oil soak rate.  The monsoon based covers gave you a good 50-60 games in a high oil volume enviornment before the poures became clogged.  It was a strong resin but it had a sponge quality to it that soaked in and retained oil.  The Horizon solid is a completely different cover with a completely different cover base and it is much stronger.
--------------------
-DJ Marshall
...The Twelve In a Row Pro Shop
Logged

KCarter069

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 267
Re: Horizon Solid = Atomic Charge?
« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2007, 01:56:11 AM »
That was from the shift seminar wasnt it DJ?
--------------------
-KCarter
Logged

charlest

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 24526
Re: Horizon Solid = Atomic Charge?
« Reply #7 on: March 26, 2007, 08:03:25 AM »
quote:
I thought the Monsoon coverstock was one of the stronger ones that Storm has. And since Storm makes/made both balls I assumed a strong Storm coverstock and a strong RotoGrip coverstock had similar characteristics.


The Monsoon is/was a strong coverstock, but time marches on.

Storm "assembles" the ball, but Roto-Grip has a different resin supplier/manufacturer than Storm does, as far as I have learned. So Storm does not use the coverstock on the Horizon in any of their balls.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see."


Edited on 3/26/2007 10:32 AM
Logged
"None are so blind as those who will not see."
Pages: [1]
« previous next »