Lol so here's the thing. I'm absolutely and totally against layout pictures, like almost unreasonably so. Layout without a PAP number means nothing. The dual angle numbers are universal, where my fingers are at on the ball means nothing without knowing what my PAP is or basically where I track at. I did a video a long time ago showing how the same layout can look very different for people with different PAP numbers or who track in different places. The only thing a layout picture can do is confuse or mislead someone. If someone sees my layout, and drills their fingers in the same place, but their PAP is 4 over and 0 up/down, they're going to get a surprise because all the sudden that layout is way stronger for them than it is for me, and I don't want to contribute to misinformation or even just the idea that a picture of a layout means anything at all. With the proper information it can, but people don't look at the information, they look at where the holes are at and ignore the actual important stuff. Now if it's just a general curiosity on where that layout puts the holes for me, sure, cool, but 95% of the people are wanting to see where my holes are at so they can copy it. I give them the dual angle numbers and they say, "no, I want to know where the holes are at so I can use the same layout." . . . . . . .
Love the INK! This ball is definitely a gem, so smooth and versatile. Great video!
Can you post a couple pics of the layouts for both balls?
