BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Roto Grip => Topic started by: Trackoholic on November 19, 2007, 07:16:54 AM

Title: Illusion vs. Track Equation
Post by: Trackoholic on November 19, 2007, 07:16:54 AM
Can anyone who has thrown both of these give a comparison on length and backend?
--------------------
Inertia-Black Widow-Machine-Power Machine-Mystic-Desert Heat-Neptune-Plastic
Title: Re: Illusion vs. Track Equation
Post by: The Bowlers Edge 2 on November 19, 2007, 07:35:15 PM
equation has just a touch more length, illusion starts up a bit sooner, they are about the same off the spot (very strong) and both continue well on the backend.
--------------------
The Bowler's Edge Pro Shop
Title: Re: Illusion vs. Track Equation
Post by: vanni9283 on November 19, 2007, 11:42:44 PM
Illusion will probably be a little-bit stronger than the Equation.

Edited on 11/20/2007 8:31 AM
Title: Re: Illusion vs. Track Equation
Post by: mttmar1975 on November 20, 2007, 03:47:56 PM
The Illusion gets more 300's and 800's.  Just some info...The ball has been released since November 8th and we have already seen 8 300's and 2 800's and numerous high 700's.  and that is in 12 days!!!  The ball hits like a truck and keeps the pins low!
--------------------
Matt Martin
Roto Grip Inc.
Marketing Manager
Title: Re: Illusion vs. Track Equation
Post by: LaneHammer20 on November 20, 2007, 04:39:25 PM
From what I have heard, the Equation is not a pearl reactive, i may be wrong. If it is I can't see it getting mor length than the pearl Illusion. I have been really aiming at an Illusion, but I need a ball wqith length with a strong move, and if you say it is rather early for a pearl I should look elsewhere
--------------------
I thought my Hammers hit hard, until I whipped a LM/L ball into the pocket. WOW!

Arsenal:
-Terminator
-Big Bang
-Buzz
-Black Widow
-Hawgzilla
-Spare Tire