Author Topic: Mars vs Neptune (Read 3271 times)

Cobalt Bomb · « **on:** August 02, 2009, 07:58:54 AM »

Can those who have thrown both tell me what the differences between the two balls are?
Thanks for your help.

golfnutFL · « **Reply #1 on:** August 02, 2009, 04:05:10 PM »

Both relatively long. Mars handles a bit more oil and, for me, is a little more aggressive off of the dry. I find the Neptune to be a good step down from the Mars.

Krakken · « **Reply #2 on:** August 02, 2009, 05:52:52 PM »

I think it is all about your surface and layout. My Mars and Neptune are both OOB condition and the Neptune is much stronger and more angular off the dry.

The Mars is weak compared to my Neptune
--------------------
ROTO GRIP, There is NO Substitute
Slow Feet, Soft hand = Lots of strikes

golfnutFL · « **Reply #3 on:** August 02, 2009, 10:57:02 PM »

Both of mine are OOB surface and drilled identically, stacked. The reaction I see is the exact opposite of yours....strange.

quote:
I think it is all about your surface and layout. My Mars and Neptune are both OOB condition and the Neptune is much stronger and more angular off the dry.

The Mars is weak compared to my Neptune

batbowler · « **Reply #4 on:** August 02, 2009, 11:16:29 PM »

My Neptune is my go to ball and is more angular at the break point than my Pluto and Mars.
--------------------
"Train a child up in the way he should go and when he is old he will "BOWL UP A STORM AND BE KING OF THEM ALL" and not turn from it."
Roto Grip - Storm : What else do you need?
Bruce Campbell
IBPSIA Certified Technician
www.rotogrip.com
www.rotogear.com

clt2244 · « **Reply #5 on:** August 03, 2009, 12:52:51 AM »

Same layout, both OOB, you will find the Mars being a lot smoother than the Neptune, i have thrown both with very similar layouts, the Mars is more mid lane with a hard arc reaction off the dry, where the Neptune is longer and more angular off the dry, the Mars will handle a little more oil but both are very nice equipment, ill also say that the Mars will handle surface change better cause its a hybrid cover.
--------------------
Only throw the good stuff, Roto/Global.
www.bowlsk.com/view-profile.html

Cobalt Bomb · « **Reply #6 on:** August 06, 2009, 04:21:42 AM »

Thank you to all the people that responded. I bought a Neptune.

Cambumbo · « **Reply #7 on:** August 11, 2009, 11:46:26 AM »

quote:
Thank you to all the people that responded. I bought a Neptune.

You will not be disappointed.

Danes07 · « **Reply #8 on:** August 11, 2009, 12:27:45 PM »

One of the best bowling balls that I have ever bought. I use it for a spare ball and for when the lanes are getting just a little dry. I am going to buy another one and put a different drilling on it and see what happens.
--------------------
University at Albany 2007
-Let's Go Danes-

ROTO GRIP - King of Them All
STORM - The Bowlers Company

Harry E. Inglis 3/31/1915 - 2/3/2009

J_w73 · « **Reply #9 on:** August 11, 2009, 12:49:00 PM »

I think the mars could seem weaker with less backend because it does handle more oil and it probably burning up more than the neptune..
I can toss my neptune on burnt and it will just roll smooth and arcing all the way to the pocket.. but some oil in the heads and mids with clean backend and my neptune will cover more boards than almost any ball out there..
I slow the spead down and use the neptune on the shark.. all backend.
--------------------
16-17 mph,350 rpm,PAP 5 1/2 x 3/8up, HighGame 300 x 3, High Series 782
Book Average 215 / 205,PBA Xperience ave180

Author Topic: Mars vs Neptune (Read 3271 times)

Cobalt Bomb

Mars vs Neptune

golfnutFL

Re: Mars vs Neptune

Krakken

Re: Mars vs Neptune

golfnutFL

Re: Mars vs Neptune

batbowler

Re: Mars vs Neptune

clt2244

Re: Mars vs Neptune

Cobalt Bomb

Re: Mars vs Neptune

Cambumbo

Re: Mars vs Neptune

Danes07

Re: Mars vs Neptune

J_w73

Re: Mars vs Neptune