win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: hot cell  (Read 11990 times)

tburky

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1071
hot cell
« on: June 11, 2017, 01:25:25 PM »
any info ;D

 

Brandon Riley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1157
Re: hot cell
« Reply #16 on: June 14, 2017, 05:04:26 PM »
Jesper Svensson will be in his glory
Brandon Riley
Brunswick Regional Staff

SVstar34

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5464
Re: hot cell
« Reply #17 on: June 14, 2017, 05:11:48 PM »
Jesper Svensson will be in his glory

Lol. He probably already drilled at least 4

Snakster

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 767
Re: hot cell
« Reply #18 on: June 15, 2017, 07:40:06 AM »
$170 for a urethane ball...pass.
Current bag:
DV8 Turmoil 2 Pearl
Radical Squatch hybrid
Motiv Forza GT
Hammer Black Widow Gold
DV8 Vandal
DV8 Creed Rebellion

djgook

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 336
  • Trying to get better!
Re: hot cell
« Reply #19 on: June 15, 2017, 08:31:15 AM »
Ish getting RIDICULOUS. $170.00 for a urethane? Somebody please explain this one to me as I am anew bowler. Isn't urethane dam near a plastic ball?
My Weapons for WAR: 15LBS. Hammer Black Widow Gold, Storm IQ Tour, Storm Timeless, Storm Drive, Hammer Black Urethane, Hammer Gauntlet.  Gold Widow Spare

suhoney24

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
Re: hot cell
« Reply #20 on: June 15, 2017, 09:18:26 AM »
Wasn't going to say it but since it's already being said the hp2 like went up $16 as well...$94 for a wreck Em and now the show off will be $110

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: hot cell
« Reply #21 on: June 15, 2017, 09:25:46 AM »
Storm's prices went up about that much. Makes sense. You're number 1 in sales, why not bump the price up?

Luke Morningwood

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
Re: hot cell
« Reply #22 on: June 15, 2017, 10:56:27 AM »
I, too, am surprised at the price point for the Hot Cell. Is it reasonable pricing, or an overreach? I guess we will know more as the first reviews and videos come out from the people we consider to be trusted sources.
For those of you old enough to remember, when the Quantum balls were first released, it was a restricted distribution through authorized pro shops and a $200 price per ball. It was an eye popping number at the time, and yet they sold quite well. Not everybody bought one. I'm sure many people at that time felt the way that many bowlers feel now about pricing, and they voted with their wallets.
Nothing has really changed. Voting with your wallet is still the easiest way to deliver a message to any industry, and you don't have to lodge a complaint to do it.
I totally get what the problem is as a consumer. It is a pretty good chunk of change to risk on buying a new ball, and nobody is directly guaranteeing you any satisfaction with it's reaction or ability to score. I would hope your pro shop operator is doing his/her best to fit your needs to a ball that will work best for you, but it is still a risk you take.

CoorZero

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1245
Re: hot cell
« Reply #23 on: June 15, 2017, 11:35:20 AM »
Ish getting RIDICULOUS. $170.00 for a urethane? Somebody please explain this one to me as I am anew bowler. Isn't urethane dam near a plastic ball?

Only if you really flatten your hand out at spares. But in that case just about every ball is going to be somewhat similar. If you're throwing a urethane and plastic normally the reactions are much different.

Yeah I'm not feeling the Hot Cell at a premium price. Not a surprise since it's in the HP4 line, but still seems over the top.

WOWZERS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 599
Re: hot cell
« Reply #24 on: June 15, 2017, 11:59:50 AM »
As for the price on the urethane....can't speak to the change in pricing for any other ball or line...if the ball is pure urethane, the lines and tanks have to be cleaned prior to the run to ensure there is no residual resin left from any previous pours. This is extra work and an extra expense that is not incurred on pouring other covers.....


BowlingforSoup

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 391
Re: hot cell
« Reply #25 on: June 15, 2017, 01:52:37 PM »
This ball says puke early on toast to me.Unless you bowl on lots of short patterns why waste the cash.My plastic with core Spare plus does fine on  32 34 35ft patterns when it gets tough and is a great for spares.Sooner or later everybody will wake up.170$ for urethane is this a joke?

mike300

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 64
Re: hot cell
« Reply #26 on: June 15, 2017, 01:54:17 PM »
I remember purchasing the original Black Hammer around 1989-1990?  Couldn't believe it was $100.  Bowling ball pricing seems to go up much slower than other sporting goods though so thankfully we aren't paying $400 for a new high performance ball.

Impending Doom

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6288
Re: hot cell
« Reply #27 on: June 15, 2017, 02:06:00 PM »
I remember purchasing the original Black Hammer around 1989-1990?  Couldn't believe it was $100.  Bowling ball pricing seems to go up much slower than other sporting goods though so thankfully we aren't paying $400 for a new high performance ball.

Shhh, Lane 1 is listening!!

BowlingforSoup

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 391
Re: hot cell
« Reply #28 on: June 15, 2017, 02:30:32 PM »
Seems like the 309$ difference put lane 1 just about out of business.Or are they out of business.Not heard any new stuff from them.No more use than you get out of urethane needs plastic ball pricing if you ask me.

Bowl_Freak

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1216
Re: hot cell
« Reply #29 on: June 15, 2017, 03:02:52 PM »
Lane 1 customer service was crap when i ordered simple Secret Sauce ball polish. Its been 4 months now and still no product. The $300+ bowling balls they try to sell are ridiculously priced. Sure they sold some to their faithfuls and staffers. Just like Lordfield/Lane Masters, i dont know of anyone other than their own staffers throwing their stuff.