BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Roto Grip => Topic started by: prmtme on April 20, 2011, 09:16:04 AM

Title: Theory vs. Nano
Post by: prmtme on April 20, 2011, 09:16:04 AM

Report Post

Theory vs. Nano      Posted on 4/20/2011 at 3:58 PM I am buying a Nano and looking at getting a Theory also because I can get one for $80 that only has 15 games on it.I threw it a couple of times and even though it was not a perfect fit I loved the reaction at 4000 abr (pin was about a inch above the ring finger).How well the 2 of these compare to each other if I leave the Theory at 4000 like the Nano. I am hoping that The Nano is stronger than the Theory throughout the lane and is strong enough that it will work having both.I am drilling the Nano pin just above the ring and to the right just a little.

Title: Re: Theory vs. Nano
Post by: Locke on April 20, 2011, 08:14:15 PM

My Theory is still at OOB 2000 and it is far stronger than the similarly drilled Nano the belongs to my teammate. My Theory is stronger than a similarly drilled Cell and Rogue Cell. It is the strongest ball Roto Grip has ever made. I am having a lot of trouble finding enough oil for it.

Always be sincere, even when you don't mean it

Title: Re: Theory vs. Nano
Post by: bighook69 on April 20, 2011, 09:10:09 PM

I have never thrown... nor seen in person a Theory... but my Nano is stupid strong on heavier stuff, I think both balls will satisfy more than the majority on the appropriate conditions. I think you could really only justify owning both if they were drilled very different and/or the surfaces were different.

Title: Re: Theory vs. Nano
Post by: Locke on April 20, 2011, 10:20:17 PM

Here is a video comparing the Theory to the Mutant Cell. The Theory just flat out moves and a lot more angular.
 

bighook69 wrote on 4/20/2011 9:10 PM:

I have never thrown... nor seen in person a Theory... but my Nano is stupid strong on heavier stuff, I think both balls will satisfy more than the majority on the appropriate conditions. I think you could really only justify owning both if they were drilled very different and/or the surfaces were different.

Always be sincere, even when you don't mean it

Title: Re: Theory vs. Nano
Post by: bighook69 on April 20, 2011, 10:35:21 PM

No link, lol. I have seen the video's on the Theory, I just have never seen one in person. I'm sure it hooks a bit though... I'm just not sure someone could justify having both a Nano and a Theory in their arsenal together, unless you only bowl on heavy oil or like I mentioned that they are set-up a bit different.
 

Locke wrote on 4/20/2011 10:20 PM:

Here is a video comparing the Theory to the Mutant Cell. The Theory just flat out moves and a lot more angular.
 

bighook69 wrote on 4/20/2011 9:10 PM:

I have never thrown... nor seen in person a Theory... but my Nano is stupid strong on heavier stuff, I think both balls will satisfy more than the majority on the appropriate conditions. I think you could really only justify owning both if they were drilled very different and/or the surfaces were different.

Always be sincere, even when you don't mean it

 

Edited by bighook69 on 4/20/2011 at 10:35 PM

Title: Re: Theory vs. Nano
Post by: Walking E on April 20, 2011, 11:14:03 PM

Perhaps the existence of said video is just ... a theory.

Official Member of the BrunsTrackColumStormHammEboRotoBuzzAMF Nation!

Also a member of ROB STONE NATION

Title: Re: Theory vs. Nano
Post by: Locke on April 28, 2011, 03:30:06 PM

And of course now I can't find the video that I had found...

Always be sincere, even when you don't mean it