win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: RSX comparisons  (Read 973 times)

NY Mike

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 532
RSX comparisons
« on: June 06, 2005, 01:48:32 AM »
Has anyone thrown Brunswick's Raging Inferno, if so, could you
provide comparison as to hook, length, etc between two balls.
I assume the Raging would turn up sooner because of its particle coverstock.

 

bowlingmytmouse

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 744
Re: RSX comparisons
« Reply #1 on: June 06, 2005, 11:56:33 AM »
NY, they aren't comparable.  I've thrown both and own a RS-x.  I'm not trying to be smart but they are completely different.  The Raging is Strictly for oil, great for floods. But your not gonna a huge bakend reaction because of its particle coverstock.

The RS-X, is a lotta hook.  When there is oil you get nice length and a hard turn when it hits the backends, you get drier heads say goodbye, that hi diff. core takes over when it hits the dry.  

And no the Raging prolly won't turn up as quick as the RS-x on dry, but it will burn up.

BMM
--------------------
Roto Grip forever!!!! What else is there??
Roto Grip forever!!!! What else is there??


Team Member Of
Hoss Central Inc.