Odd how every new new strong ball is being compared to the Cell, BuuuuTTTT, the only attribute they seem to be concerned with is how much it hooks.
Does almost everyone have their head buried in the "macho" sand??
"How much it hooks" was never the major factor that made the Cell the major break-through that it was AND STILL IS. Results are what made it what it is/was.
To my eyes and mind, the factors that made the Cell a force to be reckoned with were
- the early roll that never rolled out (and lost powere),
- targeting forgiveness,
- release forgiveness,
- power at the pocket even though it did not have the "macho ego" backend (Though it could have, if prepped that way),
- moderate mass bias strength that does not force a specific backend ball path on the user, but still gives the ball more than enough power.
90% of all the new balls still do not have these attributes to the degree that the Cell does. Maybe they hook more or have more backend, but they're still not THE CELL.
Oddly enough, these attributes seem to help not only those of us with less bowling talent, they even seem to make a difference in the hands of PBA touring professionals.
--------------------
"None are so blind as those who will not see." Unofficial Ballreviews.com FAQEdited on 8/21/2008 2:56 PM