I dont think it was Chris's intention either. And I never said he doesn't know what layouts work for him. But you can easily see the ball burning up its energy. Take it as you will, but ball motion doesn't lie. His video shows the Venator burning up, that's all. Now people can look at it and say "that ball sucks cause it don't hook!", or they can see it for what it truly is..."that ball is burning up, there's not enough oil for it".
You see his video and claim it's not strong and too much hype, I'll show you 3 more that show it is very strong. Would it be a good comparison, maybe & maybe not, but if you watch ball motion, than you will see that the ball flat out hooks. And watching his ball motion, you can see the ball start to make it's move, expends energy, than flat out labors to the pocket. I'm just pointing that out. The bowlers can make their own logical decision. Not saying it was intentional or that Chris doesn't know what he's doing, I'm just stating what I see.
As an example, there was a guy on bbe that claimed the Venator was a dud, because his first time out his Blackout hooked more. Than when he actually bowled again on "some oil", the Venator actually out hooked the Blackout by many boards. The first is a perfect example of throwing a strong ball on a condition that it isn't recommended for. Just as you wouldn't throw a plastic ball on the US Open pattern, because you wouldn't see any ball motion whatsoever. it would go straight.