Author Topic: TAKE THE STORM SURVEY! (Read 1637 times)

thunder · « **on:** June 08, 2005, 10:27:41 AM »

http://stormbowling.com/survey/survey.asp

bighook69 · « **Reply #1 on:** June 08, 2005, 06:38:33 PM »

cool, thanks
--------------------
------------------
SlickTape Advisory staff member
Track Bowling.com
Evolutionary - Revolutionary
Track Pack
dont forget www.slicktape.com

Long Island · « **Reply #2 on:** June 08, 2005, 10:04:43 PM »

I voted heres the results so far, my votes went with the majority...

Should the USBC proposed equipment specification changes banning Extra Holes be implemented?
Yes 43 votes
No 133 votes

Should the USBC proposed equipment specification changes regarding banning Drillings more than 1" away from the CG be implemented?
Yes 12 votes
No 164 votes

Should these USBC proposed changes be implemented for league play?
Yes 44 votes
No 132 votes

Should these USBC proposed changes be implemented for tournament play only?
Yes 19 votes
No 156 votes

Should the USBC logo be required on all bowling balls?
Yes 16 votes
No 160 votes

What do you believe has the biggest impact on scoring?
Balls 9 votes
Pins 8 votes
Lane conditions (oil patterns) 119 votes
Lane specifications (flat gutters, pin deck tilt) 40 votes

sportbowler · « **Reply #3 on:** June 08, 2005, 10:07:54 PM »

My votes also went with the majority
--------------------

Storm

"The bowlers Company"

icetink · « **Reply #4 on:** June 09, 2005, 12:13:13 AM »

If X-holes are going to be banned, then I think there should be no static weight limitations any longer. In asymmetrical balls, the mass bias plays a very important role in ball reaction. Asymmetrical balls cannot be drilled label (for the sake of keeping static weights legal) as symmetrical cored balls without changing the overall reaction a significant amount.

This was probably discussed before, but seeing as how the survey is playing out, x-holes just may be banned.

quote:
Cool! Thanks for the survey . I don't understand the "for tournament bowling only" question. Are you supposed to have an ENTIRE new arsenal JUST for tournaments ?

That would be utterly stupid if a rule as this would come into effect.
$800 on league arsenal and $800 on tournament arsenal = $1600
versus
$800 on league AND tournament arsenal.
Now that....is cool

--------------------
Dino
Evolutionary. Revolutionary.
Track

Edited on 6/9/2005 0:05 AM

Long Island · « **Reply #5 on:** June 09, 2005, 02:18:15 AM »

So what are you saying, they will force everyone to plug the extra holes that were drilled to comply with the static weight to begin with? That makes no sense, and wouldn't it change how the ball reacts?

Edited on 6/9/2005 2:10 AM

mumzie · « **Reply #6 on:** June 09, 2005, 02:22:25 PM »

Looks like ballot box stuffing to me...

quote:
Survey results have been recorded!
Thanks for participating.
Here are the results of the survey to date (600 total votes).

Should the USBC proposed equipment specification changes banning Extra Holes be implemented?
Yes 236 votes
No 364 votes

Should the USBC proposed equipment specification changes regarding banning Drillings more than 1" away from the CG be implemented?
Yes 37 votes
No 528 votes

Should these USBC proposed changes be implemented for league play?
Yes 238 votes
No 361 votes

Should these USBC proposed changes be implemented for tournament play only?
Yes 43 votes
No 555 votes

Should the USBC logo be required on all bowling balls?
Yes 42 votes
No 558 votes

What do you believe has the biggest impact on scoring?
Balls 32 votes
Pins 21 votes
Lane conditions (oil patterns) 344 votes
Lane specifications (flat gutters, pin deck tilt) 202 votes

--------------------
-- The way we see the problem is the problem.

Author Topic: TAKE THE STORM SURVEY! (Read 1637 times)

thunder

TAKE THE STORM SURVEY!

bighook69

Re: TAKE THE STORM SURVEY!

Long Island

Re: TAKE THE STORM SURVEY!

sportbowler

Re: TAKE THE STORM SURVEY!

icetink

Re: TAKE THE STORM SURVEY!

Long Island

Re: TAKE THE STORM SURVEY!

mumzie

Re: TAKE THE STORM SURVEY!