BallReviews

Equipment Boards => Storm => Topic started by: SplitKing on May 16, 2004, 09:31:37 PM

Title: Closer fit to El Nino 200
Post by: SplitKing on May 16, 2004, 09:31:37 PM

Which of these two balls do you all think would be a closer fit (similar in reaction) to what the El Nino 2000 was like.  The Eraser Pearl Particle or the depth charge.  I already have my opionon but want to hear from some of you out there.  If you feel it is not either one of these balls please let me know what other ball it may be.

Title: Re: Closer fit to El Nino 200
Post by: Jeffrevs on May 17, 2004, 12:35:37 PM

coverstock wise, the EPP is the same.....at least in the specs....but I'd go with the Depth,...numbers overall are closer, go the pro-thane lt plus cover.......at least that is what I would do
--------------------
JEFF
Off-season = Practice time!
Get a Grip...Roto Grip!
www.rotogrip.com

Edited on 5/17/2004 12:35 PM

Title: Re: Closer fit to El Nino 200
Post by: SplitKing on May 17, 2004, 02:19:57 PM

Hey Bob,

Thanks for the response but can you elaborate some more on what it is you saw exactly.

Title: Re: Closer fit to El Nino 200
Post by: Jeffrevs on May 17, 2004, 02:59:33 PM

SK,
2.52 rg vs 2.46 on the Depth....

both have the same diff of .055

Depth has the Prothane LT plus, the 2000 had the Prothane LT
--------------------
JEFF
Off-season = Practice time!
Get a Grip...Roto Grip!
www.rotogrip.com