win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Agent vs. Shift  (Read 855 times)

spartanplayaAA

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 140
Agent vs. Shift
« on: December 14, 2007, 08:35:10 AM »
For 15#

Shift:
RG: 2.55
Diff: 0.055

Agent:
RG: 2.47
Diff: 0.055

Is it true that an Agent will be a stronger/archier type ball compared to a Shift? Im looking at getting both these two and drilling them the same; one for medium-heavy and the other for medium sport/pba conditions.  Any imput appreciated.

Edited on 12/14/2007 5:37 PM

 

greenefam

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 852
Re: Agent vs. Shift
« Reply #1 on: December 14, 2007, 04:53:18 PM »
This is a question that I have a ton of experience with.  I had an Agent that for some reason I couldn't match up with.  I always seemed to get a strange over/under.  After a while I gave up on my Agent and got a Shift.  I bowled my high series this year (783) with the Shift within a couple of weeks of owning it after I sanded it to 2000.  The Shift has been my go-to ball since then.

After a while I got curious and I sanded my Agent to 2000 as well.  I should have done that a while ago, because ever since I have been money with the Agent as well.

I know you didn't ask me all that - but I thought I'd give you some background so that you can get a sense of the fact that I have worked with both of these balls extensively.

When both balls were OOTB polished the Shift was a stronger ball overall, but it was a bit later as well.  At 2000 they cover almost exactly the same amount of oil but they have very different reactions.  I'd say the Shift is smoother overall - but the Agent has a stronger move when it hits the dry.  Both are what I would call 'strong arcs'.

I use the Shift when there is a clear wet/dry line so that I have a smoother reaction, but I use the Agent on more of a blended transition.

I hope that helps.