BallReviews
Equipment Boards => Storm => Topic started by: Mr Straight Ball on July 22, 2008, 02:17:27 AM
-
I am posting this here as all to often I see people throwing a number out at a point of reference for soliciting help. For those that have posted a RPM number, is it official or unofficial. I know my official CATS number, that's why I am curious.
--------------------
Baker...Why doesn''t my ball h
k?
40 Boards & A Ball Tournament Director
www.40boards.com
The left sucks & the right is wide open! R.I.P. Brizmo 6/15/08
-
My number I use when describing my game came from CATS at the stadium.
-
Good thread. When I was working with advanced bowling concepts running bowlers MAP analysis I knew mine exactly and can probaly guess really close to others within 15-30rpms. We had a running joke that for anyone online stating their RPM guestimate that's never been measured, take off about 75rpms and that's more like your true number

--------------------
-DJ Marshall
...The Twelve In a Row Pro Shop. AMF Bowie Lanes -- Bowie, MD
-
I use my official CATS number when I reference it for people on this site.
--------------------
MainePBA
"I'd rather be a conservative nut job than a liberal with no nuts and no job."
-
DJ that's funny..."your number - 75 = real life"
I found out on a trip that my number was higher then I would have given myself credit for.
My 10 ball average at Kegel was 510.
Edited on 7/22/2008 10:47 AM
-
I use my CATS number but.... The CATS system is flawed it is based on how much a person with a rev rate of X would have there ball hook on a house shot (it does not actually count the revs) or take in the oil pattern. I have been on the cats system a fair number of times. When do cats on long heavy oil my rev rate is lower 270 when i do it on medium oil it reads 330 when i take it on a drier pattern it reads 420. I use the number i get on medium oil (viper).
-
In theory, a shorter pattern should lesson your number as the ball slows down faster. I am not saying I am 100% right but it's all speculation on how length or volume affects the data.
-
Just one other thing to keep in mind about rev-rates, is that not only is it relative to oil volume and viscosity, it is also relative to the rg and diff. of the ball of choice, as well as the surface of the ball. Low rg high diff. ball will rev up easier, giving a higher rev-rate than a high rg, low diff. ball.
The most accurate testing should be done with a med rg, med. diff ball on a medium length pattern with a medium viscosity oil on a medium friction surface.
Since all stars and planets are not aligned for this type of testing, the most important thing in my opinion is that your revs match your ball speed.
--------------------
Tommy Gollick
Storm Regional/Pro Shop staff
Red Crown Pro Shop Harrisburg, PA
stormbowling.com
-
Shades measured me at about 325 to 350. What's interesting is we also measured my famed one finger sling shot (just the thumb and middle finger in the ball) and that came out about 185. I use that one to line up off the Glue (Dale Traber). Snagged three regionals using it over the years and I preach to a lot of big hand guys but no one seems to take the time to add it to their cache of weapons.
(Hey Tommy G.)
-
Mr. Straight ball....I'm surprised you can't hook it!
REgards,
Luckylefty
PS most guys with 510 revs can at least get it to wrinkle!
--------------------
Open the door...see what's possible...and just walk right on through...that's how easy success feels..
-
With this proven theory, I'll use it:
Guesstimate: 325-350
Theory: -75
Real: 250-275
--------------------
Obviously, you aren't a golfer.
Check out this blog (http://"http://astronsolutionsworldofhr.blogspot.com/")
-
LuckyLefty...the name and signature provide my friends laughter.
--------------------
Baker...Why doesn't my ball h
k?
40 Boards & A Ball Tournament Director
www.40boards.com
The left sucks & the right is wide open! R.I.P. Brizmo 6/15/08
-
Well I previously had it measured but have changed so much since I did I don't have an accurate measurement.
I feel i'm close to where I was when I got it measured via CATS but to be on the safe side i'll say i'm lower than that now, so probably 275rpms.
I was measured at 315 for a 10 shot average around a year ago.
--------------------
http://www.absolutebowling.com
-
Riggs,
I will have to work on that one finger shot so I can use it against you next year!!! Hope all is well out your way.
Tommy G
--------------------
Tommy Gollick
Storm Regional/Pro Shop staff
Red Crown Pro Shop Harrisburg, PA
stormbowling.com
-
Lefties, keep both fingers in the ball, they give friction & hold free over there. Why do you think us right handers learned to play there? LMAO
-
I have calculated my rev rate from watching the rotation of the ball in a video taken from behind. It's anywhere between 225rpm and 250rpm depending on the day and how I'm having to throw it. I have actually never bowled anywhere with a full CATS system before.
-
a lot of people seem to think im up around 400, im thinking its closer to 300-325.
Never know
Shawn
-
In 1998 at the Stadium, CATS had me at 540 per Ron DeGroat using a Triton Elite Solid. At a Track Clinic, a certified instructor (Kelly Bednar) had a rev calculator on his computer and on the THS I was bowling on, he clocked me at 570 and I was using a Dry Heat.
--------------------
Steven Vance
Pro Shop Operator
If anyone out there is worried about the scores being too high, try duckpin!!
-
People tell me I'm somewhere between 150-500
-
Mr. Straight....I knew that!
Having some fun!
REgards,
Luckylefty
--------------------
Open the door...see what's possible...and just walk right on through...that's how easy success feels..
-
i think im between 1-2
--------------------
Im so glad people are brainwashed to think that TRACK sucks. And its even funnier when im carrying with my TRACK ball and they're going flat ten with their BRUNSWICK ball.
-
I've thrown on CATS several times, the most recent my rev rate averaged 520. About 18 months prior was my last CATS test which read 450. I tend to go with the lower value because I don't really think 520 is accurate, my guess is the calibration was out that day. So funnily enough with my posts the formula is CATS - 75 lol
-
Part of my reasoning on this comes from Osku and Belmo being tracked in the low 600's. Given that I feel like a little girl bowling next to them I figured I can't be within 100 lol.
-
Blockhater,
With those type of revs...your game should LOVE a block!
REgards,
Luckylefty
--------------------
Open the door...see what's possible...and just walk right on through...that's how easy success feels..
Edited on 7/23/2008 9:18 AM
-
LOL. Yeah seems to be the only patterns I can play on at the moment! Its more about hating what blocks do for the game
-
Who does not like seeing the block on the lanes these days? Plus, add in the balls and you have a potential slaughter of the pins in the making. The shot seems to be a real sticking point these days, hope USBC steps in like they should have done a long time ago and finds a point in the middle that's fair not only left to right but also from 200 rpms to 500+ rpms.
One wrong move and one style of bowler or the other will start yelling...TRAITOR!
--------------------
Baker...Why doesn't my ball h
k?
40 Boards & A Ball Tournament Director
www.40boards.com
The left sucks & the right is wide open! R.I.P. Brizmo 6/15/08
-
Riggs,
Isn't that release hard to control or hang on to the ball?
--------------------
If it doesn't come from Team Utah.
Just leave it in the car or at home.
-
Yes, you do have somewhat less control. Idea is that you create more ball reaction - and therefore miss area - with the lower revs.
-
You can use the following method to more accurately calculate your rev rate:
Find and mark your PAP with white tape (or a contrasting colour to your ball colour) and make a line with tape from your PAP to just above your ring finger hole. Set a video camera down on the approach to get the right level for videoing the ball motion and tape yourself throwing a shot.
Play back the video using software that allows you to advance one frame per click and time how long it takes the ball to complete 1 revolution. Divide that time (in seconds) by 1 to find your revs per second, then multiply by 60 to get it into RPMs.
For this method to be successful you not only need software that can play one frame per click, you need to take video in as high a frame rate (FPS) as possible in order to not miss time. I used this method yesterday, but I only get 15FPS out of my camera so it was nowhere near accurate enough. I timed for 1 second and had somewhere in the region of 8-8.25 revs in that time. I needed to use that much time to balance out the error caused by the low frame rate, but in doing so 1 second is too much time to measure true hand revs as the ball has likely encountered some friction by then and/or the core has taken over and has helped the ball rev up somewhat.
With a better camera this is the most accurate way to measure rev rate, even better than CATS because it does not rely on calculations involving speed and ball position (which have inherent errors - as exposed by throwing a plastic hard at the 10pin during a CATS test
)
Although inaccurate, I found somewhere in the region of 480-500 RPM for myself, but adjusting for the fact the core had come into affect, I would say 450 is a fair estimate. FYI I used a T-Road Pearl for the test, if somebody out there is estimating the core affect the RG is 2.57.
I know, I'm a geek... Anybody want to chime in, feel free.
Edited on 7/24/2008 6:36 AM
-
Intersting topic, and it would be good to have a benchmark, so that everyone talks about the same ting

I measured my RPM through video-taping ans some math, through the Ebonite method (also included in the FAQs). I did not have the chance to use CATS so far, but would like to know what comes out.
My first RPM measures left me with a mere 225. At that time, it was little, but realistic, because of a really poor release.
Now, some years later, I measured my RPM by the same method (to keep up consistency - if I make a mistake, it will at least be made every time
) at a maximum of around slightly more than 300 RPM, or about 14 hand revs. My normal release would - by this system of calculation - generate about 275 RPM. But: this measure is based on the head area of the lane, and just a rough measure.
These ~275 RPM are just what I think I can impart on the ball, it is effectively not what the ball does when it hits the pins. But I think it is the only "valuable" RPM number one can generate, since the lane surface, oil dressing, surface of the ball and other factors will influence what the ball does when it comes closer to the pins, and therefore I do not regard numbers that are taken at the back end for very relevant.
Anyway, if I should describe my RPM, I'd say "sufficient". I play with lower speed, and this seems to match up very well with my rev rate, creating a good ball reaction and any hook I could ask for.
Nevertheless, it is IMHO never wriong to know such "performance numbers", just like your ball speed or PAP, and RPM are a factor that I do not consider critical enough to warrant a 3-digit exactness.
--------------------
DizzyFugu (http://"http://www.putfile.com/dizzyfugu/") - Reporting from Germany
Confused by bowling?
Check out BR.com's vault of wisdom: the unofficial FAQ section (http://"http://www.ballreviews.com/Forum/Replies.asp?TopicID=74110&ForumID=16&CategoryID=5")
Secrets revealed: What's a fugu? (http://"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugu")
-
I think my last CATS session had me at 330-340 and before that I was checked at around 420, I'm inclined to believe the lesser one, especially if blockhater's numbers are only around 450...
Not measured mine by video, but will do on Sunday I think
--------------------
Reporting from England
-
WOW Rock 150 is a big difference!! 600 is in the range of Robert Smith, Osku and Jason.... You must really get a handful if thats an accurate rev rate!
What is it with CATS? I've heard numbers for some players that seem very low and others that seem to be very high, I would love to know the calculations used and why the calibrations can vary so much.
AngloBowler - I guess from you saying that you know me??
-
blockhater, I wouldn't say we're fast friends, but we've had some interesting bowling conversations on msn, Andrew (Want)

--------------------
Reporting from England
Edited on 7/24/2008 2:03 PM
-
Haha cool, always nice to see friendly faces on here...