win a ball from Bowling.com

Author Topic: Drilling question for Nano.  (Read 5186 times)

JJ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
Drilling question for Nano.
« on: July 26, 2011, 04:42:10 AM »
I have a Nano coming and it has a little more top weight that I wanted (3.09). Have any of you put Storms 3 1/2 X 5 X 3 (3 1/2 pin to pap, 5 mas bias to pap with a 3 inch pin buffer) on your Nano? What reaction would I get from this drill?


 


I bowl on a pretty heavy oil condition (41 feet) and don't have a lot of hand (285 and 16 1/2 mph). My favorite drilling is the pin next to the ring finger and the Mass Bias 3-4 inches right of my thumb hole. I am pretty sure my driller can't do that with this much top weight so I am looking for something that will work. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  The specs on the ball coming is 15.04 / 3.09 top / 2.5 - 3 inch pin.


JJ 
 
Edited by JJ on 7/26/2011 at 12:49 PM

 

ccrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2230
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2011, 09:12:52 PM »
 I don't think three oz of top weight will cause a problem with that layout. Have your driller lay the ball out like you want and he will be able to get it in spec with a weight hole.

Those that can do. Those that can't complain. Pimpin ain't easy, but it's mandatory.

Most things we like, we don't need. Most things we need, we don't like. Don't confuse your likes with your needs.

jrs813

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 239
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #2 on: July 27, 2011, 08:40:20 AM »
my driller told me when drilling mine to try and avoid weight holes in nanos when ever possible. 



ccrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2230
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #3 on: July 27, 2011, 09:27:11 AM »
Why???
 



jrs813 wrote on 7/27/2011 8:40 AM:
my driller told me when drilling mine to try and avoid weight holes in nanos when ever possible. 




Those that can do. Those that can't complain. Pimpin ain't easy, but it's mandatory.

Most things we like, we don't need. Most things we need, we don't like. Don't confuse your likes with your needs.

Dan Belcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3954
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #4 on: July 27, 2011, 09:59:07 AM »
It sounds like your driller has a misguided opinion.

 

(For the record, my Nano really came to life for me after I put a P3 extra hole in it)
 



jrs813 wrote on 7/27/2011 8:40 AM:
my driller told me when drilling mine to try and avoid weight holes in nanos when ever possible. 





jrs813

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 239
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2011, 02:36:22 AM »
i do not remember the reason of hand.  i will ask him.  he got the info from his friend who is on storm staff.

 



Russell

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2011, 05:11:04 AM »
You need a new ball driller...the core for the Nano isn't magical...weight holes enhance or limit ball motion.  If he/she doesn't understand how to utilize a weight hole you should have your stuff drilled elsewhere.


Little known fact:  In Russian "Hope" and "Change" translate to "Tax" and "Spend"

ccrider

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2230
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2011, 08:08:12 AM »

 
Russell wrote on 7/28/2011 5:11 AM:
You need a new ball driller...the core for the Nano isn't magical...weight holes enhance or limit ball motion.  If he/she doesn't understand how to utilize a weight hole you should have your stuff drilled elsewhere.


Little known fact:  In Russian "Hope" and "Change" translate to "Tax" and "Spend"

+1

The only reason I try to avoid a weight hole is if I think k might try to sale the ball later.

Those that can do. Those that can't complain. Pimpin ain't easy, but it's mandatory.

Most things we like, we don't need. Most things we need, we don't like. Don't confuse your likes with your needs.

AlBundy33

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 233
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #8 on: July 28, 2011, 10:00:32 AM »
 +1.....this whole topic has become bizarre because of the OP's 3 ounce top weight concern and not wanting to put a weight hole in the ball. Shoot, it's a minor miracle when I don't have to have a additional hole added to the ball.

 

Seems to me that you should have saved a few bucks and gotten yourself a Roto Grip Outlaw (which is almost as strong as the Nano from what I've been hearing) to potentially butcher.


Russell wrote on 7/28/2011 5:11 AM:
You need a new ball driller...the core for the Nano isn't magical...weight holes enhance or limit ball motion.  If he/she doesn't understand how to utilize a weight hole you should have your stuff drilled elsewhere.





Little known fact:  In Russian "Hope" and "Change" translate to "Tax" and "Spend"





"Pretty women make us buy beer, ugly women make us drink beer"
 
Edited by AlBundy33 on 7/28/2011 at 10:02 AM
Instead of "A Future For The Sport", it really should be "A Sport Without A Future"

completebowler

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5491
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #9 on: July 29, 2011, 06:03:04 AM »

 I agree completely. Crazy what some people come up with. As to the OP...3 oz. of top is not much at all. Should be able to use any layout you like.



Russell wrote on 7/28/2011 5:11 AM:
You need a new ball driller...the core for the Nano isn't magical...weight holes enhance or limit ball motion.  If he/she doesn't understand how to utilize a weight hole you should have your stuff drilled elsewhere.


Little known fact: In Russian "Hope" and "Change" translate to "Tax" and "Spend"


ALL STAR BOWLING & TROPHY
LANGAN'S ALL STAR LANES
IBPSIA MEMBER
WALLED LAKE MI

jrs813

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 239
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #10 on: July 29, 2011, 07:13:45 AM »
my driller is fine.   he knows how to use weight holes just fine this was merely a suggestion he brought up while drilling my nano and it stuck in my head. it came from a touring staffer. that he is best friends with and bowls regionals with.  i called him this morning left voice mail but i think he is on his way to a regional.   



tdub36tjt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1542
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #11 on: July 29, 2011, 11:21:27 AM »
Maybe he needs a new best friend instead then......jk....but seriously there is no reason to not use a weight hole in a Nano... 



Mr Straight Ball

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1021
  • 1 board or bust!
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #12 on: July 29, 2011, 11:40:57 AM »
JJ,
To open my thoughts, 41' is not long, I bowl at a house that runs a  43' pattern and most tournaments run shots between 35-41. With that said,  remember the Nano is a STRONG rock and placing the pin 3 ½"  from your pap could be overkill. There are a lot of bowlers who only see the  ball down the lane and when it does not hook, they assume the shot is tight.  What happens to a lot of us is we drill the ball so strong that it starts up and  stops before it rolls through where we are looking. I'd steer you towards the 4  x 4 x 2 layout over the 3.5 x 5 x 3 (if you want to drill from the sheet), the 4  x 4 x 2 layout gives you more looks with the ball.
 
I do have a Nano drilled weaker than what you're thinking as my rev  rate hoovers around 500 rpm and I throw it 18+ mph. This ball is like no other  as it reacts like it has teeth. For me, this ball shines of course when the  heads are tight and/or when the back ends are tighter. It is fun watching this  ball blow a pattern open. Good luck with yours.
 
P.S. A top weight of 3oz is normal


Bakes...I refuse to bevel my holes!!!
Storm Products, Inc. family member
40 Boards & A Ball - www.40boards.com
Is your Ball ready to cross 40 Boards?
40 Boards is proudly supported by Storm Products & Stepp's Glen Burnie Pro Shop

Bakes...Bevel is for wimps!!!
Storm Products, Inc. family member
40 Boards & A Ball - www.40boards.com
Storm Products, Inc. - www.stormbowling.com
Ko's Glen Burnie Pro Shop

JJ

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 158
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #13 on: July 29, 2011, 02:17:51 PM »
Thanks for all the replies and help guys.

JJ

Xcessive_Evil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1853
Re: Drilling question for Nano.
« Reply #14 on: July 30, 2011, 03:39:55 PM »
 As it was already said, that is just absurd.  Mine is 35* 4 1/4 35* with a P3 hole and it does it's job on true long/heavy oil.

I stone 8s and 9s like its cool...
YouTube.com/C6evolution2008