LOL

He at least gave something useful saying it's a ball down from the Phase II. I wouldn't think Storm would want someone pushing eauipment that went -63 for 4 on a flat pattern and then did worse on a challenge pattern and house shot. (He posted about it on his Facebook page)

Time to stir up some sh*t.  You can rename them all you want but particle balls will always suck donkey d**k imso.  At least its 2 piece I guess so sucks a tiny bit less.

I disagree. Just like any other ball with a stronger cover you have to make sure there's enough oil and do proper maintenance

I haven't had a chance to drill mine yet.  I liked the IQ Nano a ton, so hoping this one is good too, but I doubt I need that much hook on a regular basis.  Ended up polishing my IQ and it was perfect for a different shape for league, but as strong as pearls have gotten, I literally can't actually remember the last time I've thrown a solid in league, let alone one with that strong of a cover, and it's going to take a lot to pry the All Out and Danger out of my hands. 

I thought the Danger was just another ball for you?

It was . . until this weekend in Tulsa.  Now I have to eat more crow.  Danger is awful on a fresh shot, but once the track gets destroyed and you can get in and just fling it right, I'm not sure I could point out a better reaction on the market.  All Out is great on the fresh, but it doesn't quite have the guts to shape up strongly from big angles, and that's when the Danger stops acting like a 3 year old at Walmart not getting their way.  I actually was enjoying how much I was hating it, and now I just can't anymore.  I still will say it's a one trick pony, but it's really good at that trick. 

Quote from: Luke Rosdahl on November 20, 2017, 07:59:18 AM

I haven't had a chance to drill mine yet.  I liked the IQ Nano a ton, so hoping this one is good too, but I doubt I need that much hook on a regular basis.  Ended up polishing my IQ and it was perfect for a different shape for league, but as strong as pearls have gotten, I literally can't actually remember the last time I've thrown a solid in league, let alone one with that strong of a cover, and it's going to take a lot to pry the All Out and Danger out of my hands. 

I thought the Danger was just another ball for you?

We'll see . . the Hyroad Solid was ACTUAL garbage though.  Like tragically awful. 

It'll get pushed until it's available for everyone, and then a few months later it'll get burned at the stake...like the Hyroad solid was.

I CAN tell you the Torrent is great.  I haven't drilled my Nano yet so we'll see, but I imagine it will first need a ton of polish to be usable on normal conditions. 

Quote from: Luke Rosdahl on November 21, 2017, 06:58:57 AM

We'll see . . the Hyroad Solid was ACTUAL garbage though.  Like tragically awful. 

Quote from: billdozer on November 21, 2017, 02:46:30 AM

It'll get pushed until it's available for everyone, and then a few months later it'll get burned at the stake...like the Hyroad solid was.

What I don't get is how the Hy-Road Solid was so bad to people while the T-Road Solid is considered a gem. I might end up passing on the Nano for now since I've eanted a Torrent for a while and loved the Victory Road Solid.

Would really like to see the difference between the show off and Hyroad Nano because on paper they should be close.

Hy-Roads seem to rev up later. Show Offs rev up a little faster and have more of an arc. I don't think people will compain that the Hy-Road NANO is as over/under. It just sees the lane better for all styles.

I know this is a little off topic but why is the HyRoad Solid considered garbage? Never rolled the ball myself but a friend of mine loved that ball and put together quite a few nice sets with it.

For a large majority of bowlers, it was too much up the lane and not nearly enough inside.