win a ball from Bowling.com
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Spitfire VS SR300  (Read 970 times)

c-hop

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 955
Spitfire VS SR300
« on: February 21, 2007, 11:51:17 AM »
How do these 2 balls compare ?
--------------------
Chris
Logged

 

strikestriketapped

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3372
Re: Spitfire VS SR300
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2007, 08:04:30 PM »
I'm curious aswell. I'll be getting a Spit Fire from my friend in a little while. I think the Spit Fire is naturally a snappy ball. However, my friend's is drilled with the pin like 3 inches from the ring finger. I heard that this is a basic control layout.
--------------------
Hammer, Brunswick, and Storm.

www.hammerbowling.com
www.brunswickbowling.com
www.stormbowling.com
Logged

c-hop

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 955
Re: Spitfire VS SR300
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2007, 08:39:44 PM »
i was thinking of one of these for med light oil since my fired up clears the heads well but with its hard snap it can be very uncontrolable
--------------------
Chris
Logged

strikestriketapped

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3372
Re: Spitfire VS SR300
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2007, 08:46:13 PM »
The Spit Fire can work for med/light.
--------------------
Hammer, Brunswick, and Storm.

www.hammerbowling.com
www.brunswickbowling.com
www.stormbowling.com
Logged

fins4ever88

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2199
Re: Spitfire VS SR300
« Reply #4 on: February 21, 2007, 08:47:18 PM »
quote:
The Spit Fire can work for med/light.
--------------------
Hammer, Brunswick, and Storm.

www.hammerbowling.com
www.brunswickbowling.com
www.stormbowling.com


Yeah, if you're looking Med-lite, don't go with the SR300. It will be IMO way too strong.
--------------------
---Ryan
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »